首页> 外文期刊>Review of International Political Economy >Manufacturing development: how transnational market integration shapes opportunities and capacities for development in Europe's three peripheries Introduction to the special issue
【24h】

Manufacturing development: how transnational market integration shapes opportunities and capacities for development in Europe's three peripheries Introduction to the special issue

机译:制造业发展:跨国市场一体化如何塑造欧洲三个周边发展的机会和能力,对特殊问题介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

According to the dominating perspective in the literature, transnational market integration has the uniform effect of decreasing the room for development in peripheral economies that do not have the economic and political power of countries like China or Russia. Challenging this perspective, this Special Issue (SI) contrasts different integration strategies yielding dramatically different effects on developmental opportunities and capacities. By exploring various patterns of market integration, we show first, that states in peripheral economies vary in their institutional strengths to exploit developmental opportunities and that the existence of such capabilities depends on domestic political conditions. We also show, second, that depending on their integration strategy, transnational integration regimes (TIRs) can both improve and worsen developmental capacities and political conditions in these countries. The SI examines the different integration strategies used by the largest TIR, the European Union (EU), in its peripheries. The shallow model of integration allows fora la cartetrade liberalization and regulatory integration. This model helps to consolidate pre-existing rent-seeking alliances and with it, the conservation of the institutional status quo. The pro-active version of the deep model of integration can promote upgrading in domestic developmental capacities in the period of preparing new countries for membership. Once peripheral economies gain membership, the EU has limited tools to help these countries to synchronize domestic developmental needs and transnational regulatory requirements. Increasing contestation of liberal ideas is the result.
机译:根据文献中的主导视角,跨国市场一体化具有统一的效果,即在外围经济体中降低了发展的发展空间,这些经济学在中国或俄罗斯等国家的经济和政治力量。挑战这种观点,这一特殊问题(SI)对比不同的一体化策略对发育机会和能力产生显着不同。通过探索各种市场一体化模式,首先表明,外围经济体中的各国因其制度优势而异,以利用发展机会,并存在此类能力取决于国内政治条件。我们还展示了第二,取决于他们的整合策略,跨国一体化制度(TIRS)可以改善和恶化这些国家的发展能力和政治条件。 SI审查了最大TIR,欧盟(欧盟)在其外围中使用的不同一体化策略。浅薄的集成模式允许洛杉矶制品自由化和监管整合。该型号有助于巩固预先存在的租金联盟,并巩固制度现状。深度集成模型的主动版本可以促进在为会员资格准备新国家的国内发展能力升级。一旦外围经济体获得会员资格,欧盟有限的工具可以帮助这些国家同步国内发展需求和跨国监管要求。越来越多的自由主义思想争议是结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号