...
首页> 外文期刊>Review of International Political Economy >Neoliberal regime change and the remaking of global health: from rollback disinvestment to rollout reinvestment and reterritorialization
【24h】

Neoliberal regime change and the remaking of global health: from rollback disinvestment to rollout reinvestment and reterritorialization

机译:新自由主义政权更迭与全球健康重建:从回撤投资到推出再投资与重新领土化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the impacts of two interconnected but distinct regimes of neoliberalism on global health. The first is the 'rollback' regime associated most commonly with the 1980s and 1990s when efforts to build universal primary health care systems around the world were undermined by Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) and associated forms of austerity and market rule. This rollback regime of neoliberal conditionalization led to widespread health service cutbacks, user fees, and other market-driven reforms that effectively replaced plans for 'health for all' with more selective and exclusionary approaches. The second neoliberal regime has been rolled-out in part as a response to the resulting gaps in care and associated forms of suffering and ill-health. Where the rollback regime enforced disinvestment, the 'rollout' regime insists instead on prioritizing investment. But even as it thereby addresses the health risks produced by financialized neoliberal conditionalization, this reformed rollout regime has doubled-down on selectivity by adapting calculations from global finance to manage global health interventions. This emphasis on rationed and targeted life-saving investment is theorized here as illustrating a shift from the rollback regime's Laissez-faire 'macro market fundamentalism' to an Aidez-faire rollout of 'micro market foster-care'.
机译:本文探讨了两个相互关联但又不同的新自由主义制度对全球健康的影响。首先是“回滚”制度,这种制度在1980年代和1990年代最为普遍,当时结构调整计划(SAP)以及紧缩政策和市场规则的相关形式削弱了在世界范围内建立通用初级卫生保健系统的努力。新自由主义条件化的这种回退制度导致了广泛的医疗服务削减,用户费用以及其他市场驱动的改革,这些改革以更具选择性和排他性的方法有效地替代了“全民健康”计划。推出第二个新自由主义制度的部分原因是对由此产生的医疗保健以及相关的苦难和不良健康形式的差距所做出的回应。如果回滚机制强制进行了撤资,则“滚滚”机制则坚持优先考虑投资。但是,即使通过金融新自由主义条件化解决了健康风险,改革后的推广体系也通过适应全球金融计算来管理全球卫生干预措施,使选择性翻了一番。在理论上,这种对定额和有针对性的救生投资的强调表明,它已从回退政权的放任自由的“宏观市场原教旨主义”转变为对“微型市场寄养”的埃德斯放任的转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号