首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology and Design Education >Secondary level engineering professional development: content, pedagogy, and challenges
【24h】

Secondary level engineering professional development: content, pedagogy, and challenges

机译:中级工程专业发展:内容,教学法和挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The design of this study was a multiple case study conducted to examine the knowledge, pedagogical principles, and challenges involved in providing engineering-oriented professional development for teachers at the secondary school level. A set of criteria was used to identify five representative projects for analysis in the US. A variety of tools and processes were used to gather data including on-site observations, interviews, focus groups and document reviews. Results of the study indicate that engineering professional development tends to be based on work focused on curriculum development and implementation. Given the distinct design orientation of engineering, it is not surprising that the focus of engineering-oriented professional development tends to concentrate on engaging activities, with a primary focus on process rather than content. A key outcome of this study was an observed lack of a clearly formulated and articulated conceptual foundation for secondary level engineering. Regarding pedagogy, the researchers identified a heavy emphasis on modeling and applied learning. At the same time, the researchers observed a lack of emphasis on reflection and analysis of the pedagogical processes and techniques used to shape teachers’ ability to teach engineering to their students. The findings of the study also include concerns raised by teachers as they engage in engineering professional development. These include concerns about technical knowledge, particularly with the use of specialized software applications and other tools, as well as with practical issues such as time, resources, and availability of appropriate curriculum.
机译:本研究的设计是一个多案例研究,旨在研究为中学教师提供面向工程的专业发展所需的知识,教学原则和挑战。一组标准用于确定五个代表性项目,供在美国进行分析。各种各样的工具和过程被用来收集数据,包括现场观察,访谈,焦点小组和文件审查。研究结果表明,工程专业发展倾向于以课程开发和实施为重点的工作。鉴于工程的独特设计方向,以工程为导向的专业发展重点往往集中在具有吸引力的活动上,而其主要重点是过程而不是内容,这不足为奇。这项研究的主要成果是,观察到缺乏针对二级工程的明确表述和明确阐述的概念基础。关于教学法,研究人员确定了对建模和应用学习的高度重视。同时,研究人员发现他们对教学过程和技术的反思和分析缺乏重视,这些教学过程和技术用于塑造教师向学生教授工程学的能力。该研究的结果还包括教师在从事工程专业发展时提出的担忧。其中包括对技术知识的关注,特别是对使用专用软件应用程序和其他工具的关注,以及对诸如时间,资源和适当课程的可用性等实际问题的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号