首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics >Doping as technology: a rereading of the history of performance-enhancing substance use in the light of Brian Winston's interpretative model for technological continuity and change
【24h】

Doping as technology: a rereading of the history of performance-enhancing substance use in the light of Brian Winston's interpretative model for technological continuity and change

机译:作为技术进行兴奋剂:根据布赖恩·温斯顿(Brian Winston)关于技术连续性和变革的解释模型,重读提高性能的物质使用的历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article sets out to make a case for a non-moralistic and non-Manichaean approach to the doping phenomenon, where doping is seen as but one more form of technology applied for the enhancement of performance in sport. Departing from these premises, the article proposes a re-interpretation of the history of doping and anti-doping in the light of the interpretative frame proposed by the media scholar Brian Winston to analyze the processes of technological change and innovation. According to this dialectic model, the evolution of any technological novelty must be understood in the wider social framework where it develops and in particular as the result of the interplay of social accelerators (the social necessities or demands that the technology in question helps to solve) and brakes (the social forces whose status or position may be challenged by the new technologies). It is argued that the main and probably the only social force pushing forward the innovation processes in sport, including doping, derives from the inexorable tension of sport towards hierarchy, performance and victory. Among the social brakes for the development of doping one can add a part of the medical and journalistic professions, the sports governance structure and some national governments. The current state of doping practices and anti-doping policies is the result of the balance of forces in the tension between social brakes and accelerators, which accounts for all the apparent inconsistencies and whims of the current list of prohibited substances and methods.View full textDownload full textKeywordsanti-doping, cycling, technology, history, innovationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.627361
机译:本文着手探讨一种非道德和非大麻兴奋剂现象的方法,在这种方法中,兴奋剂被视为是提高运动成绩的另一种技术形式。脱离这些前提,本文根据媒体学者布莱恩·温斯顿(Brian Winston)提出的解释框架,对掺杂和反掺杂的历史进行了重新解释,以分析技术变革和创新的过程。根据这种辩证模型,必须在更广泛的社会框架中理解任何技术新颖性的演变,尤其是社会加速器相互作用的结果(所讨论的技术有助于解决的社会必要性或要求)和制动器(其地位或地位可能会受到新技术挑战的社会力量)。有人认为,推动体育创新过程(包括兴奋剂)的主要且可能是唯一的社会力量,源于体育对等级制度,表现和胜利的无可避免的紧张。在兴奋剂发展的社会刹车中,可以增加医疗和新闻业,体育治理结构以及一些国家政府的一部分。兴奋剂做法和反兴奋剂政策的当前状态是社会刹车和加速器之间紧张关系中力量平衡的结果,这解释了当前禁用物质和方法清单中所有明显的矛盾之处和奇思妙想。查看全文下载全文关键字反兴奋剂,骑车,技术,历史,创新相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多” ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.627361

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号