首页> 外文期刊>International journal of selection and assessment >On Minimizing Guessing Effects on Multiple-Choice Items: Superiority of a two solutions and three distractors item format to a one solution and five distractors item format
【24h】

On Minimizing Guessing Effects on Multiple-Choice Items: Superiority of a two solutions and three distractors item format to a one solution and five distractors item format

机译:关于使猜测对多种选择项的影响最小化:两个解决方案和三个干扰项的格式优于一个解决方案和五个干扰项的格式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Multiple-choice response formats are troublesome, as an item is often scored as solved simply because the examinee may be lucky at guessing the correct option. Instead of pertinent Item Response Theory models, which take guessing effects into account, this paper considers a psycho-technological approach to re-conceptualizing multiple-choice response formats. The free-response format is compared with two different multiple-choice formats: a traditional format with a single correct response option and five distractors ('1 of 6'), and another with five response options, three of them being distractors and two of them being correct ('2 of 5'). For the latter format, an item is scored as mastered only if both correct response options and none of the distractors are marked. After the exclusion of a few items, the Rasch model analyses revealed appropriate fit for 188 items altogether. The resulting item-difficulty parameters were used for comparison. The multiple-choice format '1 of 6' differs significantly from the multiple-choice format '2 of 5', while the latter does not differ significantly from the free-response format. The lower difficulty of items '1 of 6' suggests guessing effects.
机译:多项选择的回答格式很麻烦,因为一个项目通常被评定为已解决,这仅仅是因为应试者可能会幸运地猜到正确的选项。本文不考虑相关的项目反应理论模型(考虑猜测的影响),而是考虑一种心理技术方法来重新概念化多项选择反应的格式。将自由响应格式与两种不同的多项选择格式进行比较:一种具有单个正确响应选项和五个干扰项(“ 1 of 6”)的传统格式,另一种具有五个响应选项,其中三个为干扰项,两个为它们是正确的(“ 5之2”)。对于后一种格式,只有在正确的答案选项和干扰项均未标记的情况下,项目才被评为熟练。排除一些项目后,Rasch模型分析显示总共适合188个项目。所得的项目难度参数用于比较。多项选择格式“ 1 of 6”与多项选择格式“ 2 of 5”有显着差异,而后者与自由响应格式没有显着差异。项目“ 1 of 6”的较低难度表明猜测的效果。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Centre of Testing and Consulting, Division of Psychological Assessment and Applied Psychometrics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Centre of Testing and Consulting, Division of Psychological Assessment and Applied Psychometrics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Centre of Testing and Consulting, Division of Psychological Assessment and Applied Psychometrics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Centre of Testing and Consulting, Division of Psychological Assessment and Applied Psychometrics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

    Centre of Testing and Consulting, Division of Psychological Assessment and Applied Psychometrics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:28:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号