首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Marketing >Extent and impact of response biases in cross-national survey research
【24h】

Extent and impact of response biases in cross-national survey research

机译:跨国调查研究中回应偏差的程度和影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Survey research is fraught with serious response biases. This study examines the extent and impact of three important response biases in cross-national research: socially desirable responding, yea-saying, and nay-saying. From a survey of 5569 respondents across 15 countries, the study finds evidence of substantial differences in response biases across countries. Socially desirable responding is highest in Singapore and Italy, yea-saying is highest in Brazil and India, and nay-saying is highest in the Netherlands and Japan. These response biases lead to erroneous conclusions about innovativeness based on surveys as compared to that based on the market penetration of new products. In particular, the biases lead to the over-reporting or underreporting of innovative traits and the over-reporting of the adoption of new products. Overall, negatively valenced items that show the least susceptibility to these response biases can help predict both actual penetration at the aggregate level as well as individual probabilities of adoption and should be included in cross-national surveys.
机译:调查研究充满了严重的反应偏见。这项研究考察了跨国研究中三个重要反应偏见的程度和影响:社会上期望的反应,说是和拒绝。通过对15个国家/地区的5569名受访者进行的调查,该研究发现了国家/地区在回应偏见方面存在实质性差异。在新加坡和意大利,社会期望回应率最高,在巴西和印度,说是肯定的回答最多,而在荷兰和日本,说是否定的回答最多。与基于新产品市场渗透的调查相比,基于调查的这些反应偏差导致有关创新性的错误结论。尤其是,这些偏见会导致对创新性状的过高报道或过少报道,以及对新产品采用的过高报道。总体而言,对这些响应偏差的敏感性最小的负价项目可以帮助预测总体水平上的实际渗透率以及采用的个体概率,应将其包括在跨国调查中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号