首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education >Sharing outsider thinking: thinking (differently) with Deleuze in educational philosophy and curriculum inquiry
【24h】

Sharing outsider thinking: thinking (differently) with Deleuze in educational philosophy and curriculum inquiry

机译:共享外部人的思想:在教育哲学和课程探索中与德勒兹(不同)地思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay performs a number of our collaborative responses to thinking (differently) with Deleuze in educational philosophy and curriculum inquiry. Deleuze and Guattari have inspired each of us in distinctive ways. Single‐authored products include a series of narrative experiments or ‘rhizosemiotic play’ in writing educational philosophy and theory, and a doctoral thesis enacting processes of ‘rhizo‐imaginary’ ‘picturing’ towards immanent and emergent curriculum theorising. We have also collaborated in producing some co‐authored works, which has motivated us to persevere with exploring further potentials for thinkingwriting together. By exploring our genealogical and generative work with Deleuzean conceptual creations in mind, we seek to move readers beyond Deleuzo‐Guattarian select metaphors (e.g. nomadism, rhizome, lines of flight, smooth and striated spaces). However, we distance ourselves from the types of ‘use’ of Deleuze that merely appropriate metaphors that were never intended as metaphors. Rather, we prefer thinking with Deleuze to produce previously unthought questions, practices and knowledge. We intend these performances to give a sense of not only the generativity that Deleuzo‐Guattarian readingthinking has opened to us but also the affirmation such performances bestow for thinking (differently) in educational philosophy and curriculum inquiry.View full textDownload full textKeywordsDeleuze, education, curriculum, thinkingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500631
机译:本文与德勒兹在教育哲学和课程探究方面对我们的思维进行了许多不同的协作响应。 Deleuze和Guattari以独特的方式启发了我们每个人。 Single创作的产品包括一系列书写教育哲学和理论的叙事实验或“根瘤菌游戏”,以及一篇博士论文,阐述了“ rhizo”虚构“ picturing”过程向内在的过程。以及新兴的课程理论。我们还合作制作了一些共同创作的作品,这促使我们坚持不懈地探索进一步思考的可能性。通过考虑德勒兹人的概念创作来探索我们的家谱和创举作品,我们力求使读者超越德勒佐人的瓜塔尔式选择隐喻(例如游牧主义,根茎,飞行路线,光滑而有条纹的空间)。但是,我们将自己与Deleuze的“ use”类型区分开来,后者只是合适的隐喻,而从未打算将其用作隐喻。相反,我们更喜欢与Deleuze一起思考,以产生以前未曾思考过的问题,实践和知识。我们希望这些表演不仅能给人以德勒索(Deleuzo)Guattarian阅读思维给我们带来的影响力,而且可以肯定这种表演在教育哲学和课程探究中得到不同思考的肯定。查看全文下载全文关键字德勒兹,教育,课程,思维相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500631

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号