首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Three decades, four phases: Public administration development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989-2017
【24h】

Three decades, four phases: Public administration development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989-2017

机译:三十年,分为四个阶段:中欧和东欧的公共行政发展,1989-2017年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the public administration (PA) development in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) from an ex post perspective covering the past three decades. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reviews prior literature on CEE and PA paradigms. The authors propose to distinguish between four main phases of public sector development in new democracies: post-communist transition, EU accession, post-accession fine-tuning, and e-governance. Findings: There were many common features in the polities and PAs of the CEE countries at the beginning of the 1990s because of their common communist legacy, and also during the EU accession period, stemming from the “administrative capacity” requirement by the EU. However, domestic decisions of individual CEE governments following accession have moved them apart from each other. While some CEE countries face reversals of democratic public governance reforms, others are leading e-government initiatives - the current phase of public sector development. Research limitations/implications: The choice of countries is limited to the new member states of the European Union. Originality/value: The paper shows that it is increasingly difficult to generalize findings, let alone to offer recommendations, that apply to all CEE countries. This is likely to lead to an end of a specific CEE administrative tradition as previously conceptualized in academic literature.
机译:目的:本文的目的是从事后角度全面回顾中欧和东欧(CEE)的公共行政(PA)的发展,涵盖过去的三十年。设计/方法/方法:本文回顾了有关CEE和PA范例的现有文献。作者建议在新民主国家中区分公共部门发展的四个主要阶段:共产主义后过渡,加入欧盟,加入后微调和电子政务。研究结果:1990年代初,中欧和东欧国家的政体和公共行政有许多共同特征,因为它们具有共产主义传统,而且在欧盟加入期间,源于欧盟对“行政能力”的要求。但是,加入后各个中东欧国家政府的国内决定使它们彼此分开。一些中欧和东欧国家面临民主公共治理改革的逆转,而其他一些国家则领导着电子政务计划,即公共部门发展的当前阶段。研究的局限性/意义:国家的选择仅限于欧盟的新成员国。原创性/价值:该文件表明,将适用于所有中东欧国家的调查结果归纳起来越来越困难,更不用说提供建议了。这很可能导致以前在学术文献中概念化的特定CEE行政传统的终结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号