首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement projects in Indonesia
【24h】

Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement projects in Indonesia

机译:印尼PPP与传统采购项目的比较表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the outcomes of Indonesian power projects as representative projects of Asian emerging economies that were procured via public-private partnerships (PPPs) and traditional public sector procurement. Power generation infrastructure delivery in emerging economies frequently seeks private participation via PPPs as one of the key mechanisms to attract private finance. Undertaking a comparative benchmark study of the outcomes of Indonesian power projects provides an opportunity to explore the historic evidence as to whether PPPs deliver better outcomes than traditional public procurement in emerging economies. Design/methodology/approach - This paper reports on a study of the performance of 56 Indonesian power projects procured via either PPPs or traditional procurement. First, it focusses on project time and cost outcomes of power plant facility during construction and commissioning and then extends this comparison to consider the operating availability of power plants during their first two years of operation. Findings - The results indicate that PPP projects had superior time and operating availability to those procured traditionally whereas no significant differences were identified in the cost performance between PPPs and traditionally procured projects. These findings highlight the importance of adopting policies that are supported by broader sources of international financiers and high quality power plant developers. Research limitations/implications - The quality performance analyses of projects (based on equivalent available factor indices) were limited to the power plants in the Java-Bali region where the majority of projects are large scale power plants. Practical implications - This study provides an empirical basis for governments of emerging economies to select the most beneficial procurement strategy for power plant projects. It highlights the importance of selecting experienced providers and to adopt policies that attract high quality international project financiers and power plant developers. This includes the need to ensure the commercial viability of projects and to seriously consider the use of cleaner power technologies. Originality/value - This study is the first to compare the outcomes of power projects in Asian emerging economies delivered via PPPs against those delivered by traditional public procurement that includes consideration of the quality of the delivered product.
机译:目的-本文的目的是调查作为亚洲新兴经济体代表项目的印尼电力项目的成果,这些项目是通过公私伙伴关系(PPP)和传统的公共部门采购而获得的。新兴经济体的发电基础设施交付经常通过PPP寻求私人参与,这是吸引私人资金的主要机制之一。对印尼电力项目的结果进行比较基准研究,为探索历史性证据提供了机会,即有关PPPs是否比新兴经济体中的传统公共采购提供更好的结果。设计/方法/方法-本文报告了对通过PPP或传统采购而获得的56个印尼电力项目的绩效进行的研究。首先,它着重于电厂设施在建设和调试期间的项目时间和成本结果,然后扩展此比较范围,以考虑电厂运营的前两年的运营可用性。调查结果-结果表明,PPP项目比传统采购项目具有更长的时间和运营可用性,而PPP项目与传统采购项目之间在成本绩效方面没有发现重大差异。这些发现凸显了采取政策的重要性,这些政策应得到国际金融机构和高质量发电厂开发商的广泛支持。研究的局限性/意义-项目的质量绩效分析(基于等效的可用因子指数)仅限于Java-Bali地区的发电厂,那里的大多数项目都是大型发电厂。实际意义-这项研究为新兴经济体的政府为电厂项目选择最有利的采购策略提供了经验基础。它强调了选择经验丰富的提供商并采取吸引高质量国际项目融资人和电厂开发商的政策的重要性。这包括需要确保项目的商业可行性,并认真考虑使用清洁能源技术。独创性/价值-这项研究是首次将通过PPP交付的亚洲新兴经济体电力项目的结果与传统公共采购交付的结果进行比较,其中包括对交付产品质量的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号