首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >The effect of different higher education fee policies on education A comparison between England and Germany
【24h】

The effect of different higher education fee policies on education A comparison between England and Germany

机译:不同的高等教育收费政策对教育的影响英格兰和德国的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Higher education (HE) sectors form an important part of societies and their economy, on which the members of a society depend for their individual and collective future benefit. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the perceptions of accounting academics on the introduction of HE tuition fees in both England and Germany, and how this policy has affected the everyday life of academics and students alike in each country. The respective funding and reform approach sets the context of this study. Design/methodology/approach - The study has adopted a qualitative methodology, analysing data collected through semi-structured interviews. Accounting academics discuss their perceptions of both policies in the respective context. Academics were focussed on as implementers of educational policies. Accounting academics were chosen due to their academic and professional background, changing academic position in the global market and their representative stance in the academic context. The data analysis took place through coding interview data. Findings - While England's fees have been increased several times over the past 15 years, few German federal states have introduced, and have already abolished the policy. Reasons as to why the outcomes are so radically different are discussed based on interviews with accounting academics, and the implications for future practice are that to be successful political support must be sustained regardless of the changing governments, and the HE sector itself must have strong champions supporting this policy. Furthermore, the effect of the respective tuition fee policy with regard to education is addressed, which suggests that English students have a broader education package expectation, while with regard to actual classroom education both German and English students have similar outlooks. A further issue is the different political and education contexts, the current state of affairs and the societal impact. Originality/value - This study is one of the few to compare directly the differing tuition fee policies and the educational implications of these policies of Germany and England. These two cases are an illustration that Germany and England are at the opposite ends of the reform spectrum and that academics experience different expectations due to such different fee policies.
机译:目的-高等教育(HE)部门是社会及其经济的重要组成部分,社会成员为个人和集体的未来利益而赖以生存。本文的目的是讨论在英国和德国,会计学者对引入高等学校学费的看法,以及该政策如何影响每个国家的学者和学生的日常生活。各自的资金和改革方法为这项研究奠定了基础。设计/方法/方法-该研究采用了定性方法,分析了通过半结构化访谈收集的数据。会计学者在各自的背景下讨论他们对两种政策的看法。学术界专注于作为教育政策的实施者。选择会计学者的原因是他们的学术和专业背景,不断变化的全球市场学术地位以及他们在学术背景下的代表立场。数据分析是通过对采访数据进行编码来进行的。调查结果-在过去15年中,英格兰的收费提高了数倍,但几乎没有德国联邦州实行,并且已经废除了这项政策。在与会计学者的访谈中讨论了结果为何如此根本不同的原因,并且对未来实践的影响是,无论政局如何变化,成功的政治支持都必须得到持续,而且高等教育部门本身必须有强大的支持者支持这项政策。此外,解决了相应学费政策对教育的影响,这表明英语学生对教育套餐的期望更高,而就实际课堂教育而言,德国和英语学生的前景相似。另一个问题是不同的政治和教育背景,当前的事务状况和社会影响。原创性/价值-这项研究是直接比较不同的学费政策和德国和英国这些政策的教育意义的少数研究之一。这两个案例说明德国和英国处于改革范围的两端,并且由于收费政策的不同,学者们的期望也有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号