【24h】

Guest editorial

机译:客座社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Globally, local authorities are significant players in the provision of public services, and increasingly there has been a strong impetus to improve local service delivery (Kopric et aL, 2017; Dollery et aL, 2008; United Cities and Local Governments, 2008) and citizen satisfaction with public services (Van de Walle, 2018). In recent decades decentralization, usually with the support of international organizations, has become an important reform strategy in many countries. Traditional arguments in favor of such reforms suggest that efficiency and quality gains in the provision of public services are achieved through decentralization along with greater expectations of accountability and responsiveness. But is local really always better? Some scholars warn that there are significant dangers involved in decentralization. For example, local administrations might be understaffed, or financially weak, or they could be captured by local political elites, which could all potentially lead to poorer public service provision.
机译:在全球范围内,地方当局在提供公共服务方面发挥着重要作用,并且越来越有强大的动力来改善当地服务的提供(Kopric等,2017; Dollery等,2008;联合城市和地方政府,2008)和公民对公共服务的满意度(Van de Walle,2018)。在最近几十年中,通常在国际组织的支持下,权力下放已成为许多国家的重要改革战略。支持这种改革的传统论点表明,通过权力下放以及对问责制和响应能力的更高期望,可以实现公共服务提供效率和质量的提高。但是当地真的总是更好吗?一些学者警告说,权力下放有很大的危险。例如,地方行政部门可能人手不足或财务状况不佳,或者可能被地方政治精英所俘虏,所有这些都可能导致公共服务提供质量下降。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    School of Management and Law, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland;

    School of Management and Law, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland;

    School of Government, University of The Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa, and;

    Department of Political Science, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:32:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号