首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Coordinating and pricing decisions in two competitive reverse supply chains with different channel structures
【24h】

Coordinating and pricing decisions in two competitive reverse supply chains with different channel structures

机译:两个竞争性反向供应链中的协调和定价决策,具有不同渠道结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper addresses coordination and competition problem in two reverse supply chains each having its own exclusive retailer and manufacturer. The chains have various collecting channel structures so that one of them uses the advantages of dual channels, where the consumer can return their e-waste through direct or traditional channels, while its competitor collects obsolete products only through its traditional channel. The willingness to return in each channel is a function of self- and cross-discounts of the competitors. Four decision scenarios are investigated; the first and second chain respectively select, Decentralised-Decentralised, Centralised-Centralised, Centralised-Decentralised or Decentralised-Centralised scenario. The closed-form optimal solution of each channel is derived based on the Stackelberg game when the second chain acts as a leader. The most economical scenario is determined by using a Non-Zero-Sum game when each chain plays as a single player in the game. To coordinate the members' decisions and to convince unsatisfied members, two coordination contracts are offered. Numerical investigations reveal that direct channel suggests more discount and obtains more share of market. The results show that Centralised-Centralised scenario is the best decision from the SCs' perspective which proposing contracts are able to persuade members to change their strategy to a global decision.
机译:本文涉及两个反向供应链中的协调和竞争问题,每个都具有自己的独家零售商和制造商。链条具有各种收集渠道结构,使得其中一个使用双频道的优点,消费者可以通过直接或传统渠道返回其电子废物,而其竞争对手仅通过其传统渠道收集过时的产品。在每个频道返回的意愿是竞争对手的自我和交叉折扣的函数。调查了四种决策情景;第一和第二链分别选择,分散 - 分散,集中式集中,集中式分散或分散的集中式情景。当第二链作为领导者时,基于Stackelberg游戏导出每个通道的闭合形式最佳解决方案。当每个链作为游戏中的单个玩家时,通过使用非零和游戏来确定最经济的场景。为协调成员的决定并说服不满意的成员,提供了两项协调合同。数值调查显示,直接渠道表明更多的折扣并获得更多的市场份额。结果表明,集中式集中式情景是SCS的透视中的最佳决定,提出合同能够说服成员将其战略改为全球决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号