首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Philosophical Studies >Postmetaphysical Thinking or Refusal of Thought? Max Horkheimer's Materialism as Philosophical Stance
【24h】

Postmetaphysical Thinking or Refusal of Thought? Max Horkheimer's Materialism as Philosophical Stance

机译:后形而上学的思维还是拒绝思维?马克思·霍克海默的唯物主义作为哲学立场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Frankfurt School critical theory has long opposed metaphysical philosophy because it ignores suffering and injustice. In the face of such criticism, proponents of metaphysics (for example Dieter Henrich) have accused critical theory of not fully investigating the questions is raises for itself, and falling into partial metaphysical positions, despite itself. If one focuses on Max Horkheimer's early essays, such an accusation seems quite fitting. There he vociferously attacks metaphysics, but he also develops a theory that pushes toward metaphysical questions. His work can thus seem laden with unpacked metaphysical baggage, and fraught with contradiction. The aim of this paper is to show that Horkheimer's critique of metaphysics makes sense and is not contradicted by a surreptitious metaphysics. To show this, Horkheimer's views will be compared with Bas van Fraassen's in The Empirical Stance. Ultimately, the paper should show that Horkheimer's early philosophy can be reconstructed in such a way that it employs a 'materialist stance'.
机译:法兰克福学派的批判理论长期以来一直反对形而上学的哲学,因为它忽略了痛苦和不公正。面对这样的批评,形而上学的支持者(例如Dieter Henrich)曾指责批判理论没有完全调查问题本身是否引起人们的注意,并且尽管存在,却陷入了部分形而上学的立场。如果将重点放在马克斯·霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)的早期论文上,那么这种指责似乎是很恰当的。他在那里大肆抨击形而上学,但他也发展了一种推论形而上学问题的理论。因此,他的工作似乎充满了无形的形而上学的行李,充满了矛盾。本文的目的是表明霍克海默的形而上学批判是​​有道理的,并且与秘密的形而上学没有矛盾。为了说明这一点,霍克海默的观点将与《经验立场》中的巴斯·范·弗拉森(Bas van Fraassen)的观点进行比较。最终,该论文应表明,霍克海默的早期哲学可以通过采用“唯物主义立场”的方式来重构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号