首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence >MINIMAL NONSIMPLE SETS OF VOXELS IN BINARY IMAGES ON A FACE-CENTERED CUBIC GRID
【24h】

MINIMAL NONSIMPLE SETS OF VOXELS IN BINARY IMAGES ON A FACE-CENTERED CUBIC GRID

机译:面心立方网格上二元图像中的体素的最小非简单集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One can prove that a specified parallel thinning algorithm always preserves the topology of the input binary image by verifying that no iteration of that algorithm can ever delete a minimal non-simple ("MNS") set of 1's of an image. For binary images on a 3D face-centered cubic ("FCC") grid, we determine which sets of voxels can be MNS, and also determine which of those sets can be MNS without being a component of the 1's. These two problems are complicated by the fact that there are (at least) three reasonable ways of defining connectedness for sets of 1's and 0's in a binary image on an FCC grid, since one can: (a) use 18-connectedness for setsof 1's and 12-connectedness for sets of 0's; (b) use 12-connectedness both for sets of 1's and for sets of 0's; (c) use 12-connectedness for sets of 1's and 18-connectedness for sets of 0's. We solve the two problems in all three cases. The analogous problems for binary images on Cartestin grids were first solved by Ronse (in the 2D case) and Ma (in the 3D case). However, our treatment of simple 1's and MNS sets is rather different from theirs, in that it is based on the attachment sets of 1's in binary images. This concept was introduced in an earlier paper [T.Y.Kong, "On topology preservation in 2-D and 3-D thinning," Int. J. pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 9 (1995) 813-844] and we use the same general approach to MNS sets as was used there. The voxels of an FCC grid are rhombic dodecahedra, which are rather more difficult to visualize and draw than the cubical voxels of a 3D Cartesian grid. An advantage of working
机译:可以通过验证该算法的任何迭代都不能删除图像的最小非简单(“ MNS”)集1来证明指定的并行稀疏算法始终保留输入二进制图像的拓扑。对于3D面心立方(“ FCC”)网格上的二进制图像,我们确定哪些体素集合可以是MNS,并且还确定其中哪些集合可以是MNS而不是1的组成部分。这两个问题由于以下事实而变得复杂:存在(至少)三种合理的方式来定义FCC网格上二进制图像中1和0的集合的连通性,因为一个人可以:(a)对18个连通的1的集合使用18-连通性一组0的12个连接; (b)为1的集合和为0的集合使用12连接; (c)对1的集合使用12连通性,对0的集合使用18连通性。我们在所有三种情况下都解决了两个问题。 Cartestin网格上二进制图像的类似问题首先由Ronse(在2D情况下)和Ma(在3D情况下)解决。但是,我们对简单1和MNS集的处理与它们的处理有很大不同,因为它基于二进制图像中1的附件集。此概念是在较早的论文中提出的[T.Y. Kong,“关于2-D和3-D细化中的拓扑保留”,Int。 J.模式识别和人工智能9(1995)813-844],我们对MNS集使用与那里使用的相同的一般方法。 FCC网格的体素是菱形十二面体,比3D笛卡尔网格的立体体素更难以可视化和绘制。工作的优势

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号