...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of open source software & processes >Performance Evaluation of Xen, KVM, and Proxmox Hypervisors
【24h】

Performance Evaluation of Xen, KVM, and Proxmox Hypervisors

机译:Xen,KVM和Proxmox虚拟机管理程序的性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hardware virtualization plays a major role in IT infrastructure optimization in private data centers and public cloud platforms. Though there are many advancements in CPU architecture and hypervisors recently, but overhead still exists as there is a virtualization layer between the guest operating system and physical hardware. This is particularly when multiple virtual guests are competing for resources on the same physical hardware. Understanding performance of a virtualization layer is crucial as this would have a major impact on entire IT infrastructure. This article has performed an extensive study on comparing the performance of three hypervisors KVM, Xen, and Proxmox VE. The experiments showed that KVM delivers the best performance on most of the selected parameters. Xen excels in file system performance and application performance. Though Proxmox has delivered the best performance in only the sub-category of CPU throughput. This article suggests best-suited hypervisors for targeted applications.
机译:硬件虚拟化在私有数据中心和公共云平台的IT基础架构优化中起着重要作用。尽管最近CPU架构和虚拟机管理程序有了许多进步,但是由于来宾操作系统和物理硬件之间存在虚拟化层,因此开销仍然存在。当多个虚拟来宾在同一物理硬件上争夺资源时,尤其如此。了解虚拟化层的性能至关重要,因为这会对整个IT基础架构产生重大影响。本文已经进行了广泛的研究,比较了三种虚拟机管理程序KVM,Xen和Proxmox VE的性能。实验表明,KVM在大多数选定参数上均具有最佳性能。 Xen在文件系统性能和应用程序性能方面表现出色。尽管Proxmox仅在CPU吞吐量的子类别中提供了最佳性能。本文为目标应用程序提供了最适合的虚拟机管理程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号