首页> 外文期刊>International journal of multicriteria decision making >Comparing heuristic and evolutionary approaches for minimising the number of tardy jobs and maximum earliness on a single machine
【24h】

Comparing heuristic and evolutionary approaches for minimising the number of tardy jobs and maximum earliness on a single machine

机译:比较启发式和进化式方法,以最大程度地减少单台机器上的拖延工作数和最大提前度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The bi-criterion problem of minimising the number of tardy jobs and maximum earliness on a single machine is investigated experimentally. Two approximate solution approaches are tested. The first one is based on transforming the bi-criterion problem into a series of single-objective sub-problems and then applying a deterministic, heuristic procedure to solve them iteratively. The second approach is based on a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with random keys encoding scheme. A dataset of 180 problem instances with 50, 100, and 150 jobs was generated randomly in order to evaluate the performance of the two approaches. The Pareto optimal sets computed by the evolutionary approach were consistently under-populated when compared to those of the heuristic however; more than 60% of the solutions found by the heuristic in all instances were dominated by solutions generated by the evolutionary algorithm.
机译:通过实验研究了使单台机器上的迟到的工作数量最小化和最大化的早期性的双重标准问题。测试了两种近似解决方案方法。第一个是基于将双标准问题转换为一系列单目标子问题,然后应用确定性启发式过程来迭代求解它们。第二种方法基于具有随机密钥编码方案的多目标进化算法。为了评估这两种方法的性能,随机生成了包含50、100和150个作业的180个问题实例的数据集。然而,与启发式方法相比,通过进化方法计算出的帕累托最优集始终人口不足。在所有情况下,启发式算法发现的解决方案中有60%以上由进化算法生成的解决方案所控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号