【24h】

The well-to-wheel analysis of hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas for heavy-duty vehicles using life cycle approach to a fuel cycle

机译:使用生命周期方法进行燃料循环的重型车辆富氢压缩天然气的轮到车轮分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Increasing urban air pollution, greenhouse gases, and declining fossil energy sources are the three major problems of transportation sector which drive the use of alternative vehicular fuels to prevent energy shortage, reduce oil dependency and decrease tailpipe emissions including air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. This research work focused on life cycle analysis of HCNG (R) heavy-duty vehicle in which 20% gaseous hydrogen blended with compressed natural gas has been investigated in terms of net energy ratio, GHG value, and cost-effectiveness over a scale of 'per MJ energy output' in two fuel options, i.e. 0%HCNG and 20%HCNG for an entire well-to-wheel cycle. An engineering economic approach has been used to evaluate cost-effectiveness ratio of CNG and 20%HCNG pathways derived from fuel economy improvement. It has been shown that at pump-to-wheel stage, 7% reduction in fuel consumption can be achieved together with 11% reduction in GHGs, 7% reduction in energy consumption at operation and 7% reduction in total costs (RMB/MJ) for 20%HCNG compared with CNG. Rank (1 means 'best and 10 means 'worst') showed that renewable-based hydrogen pathways such as solar, wind and biomass showed dual benefits of lower energy consumption and lower GHG emissions whereas grid electricity-to-hydrogen displayed the worst case in both scenarios. Usually, biomass-based HCNG pathways may have higher net energy ratio, but the sources are cleaner, and renewable in nature. The energy efficiency of fossil-based pathways such as natural gas, coal, etc., is higher than biomass gasification pathway.
机译:日益严重的城市空气污染,温室气体和化石能源的减少是交通运输部门的三个主要问题,这些问题促使人们使用替代车辆燃料来防止能源短缺,减少对石油的依赖并减少包括空气污染物和温室气体排放在内的排气管排放。这项研究工作集中在HCNG(R)重型汽车的生命周期分析上,其中已对20%的气态氢与压缩天然气混合进行了净能量比,GHG值和成本效益方面的研究,每MJ能量输出”两种燃料选择,即整个轮对轮循环的0%HCNG和20%HCNG。一种工程经济方法已被用于评估从燃料经济性改善中获得的CNG和20%HCNG途径的成本效益比。研究表明,在轮对泵阶段,可将燃油消耗减少7%,同时将温室气体减少11%,将运行中的能源消耗减少7%,并将总成本(人民币/兆焦耳)减少7%。与压缩天然气相比,HCNG的含量为20%。等级(1表示“最佳”,10表示“最差”)表明,基于可再生能源的氢气路径(例如太阳能,风能和生物质)显示出降低能耗和降低温室气体排放的双重优势,而电网用电制氢表现最差。两种情况。通常,基于生物质的HCNG途径可能具有更高的净能量比,但来源更清洁,并且本质上是可再生的。基于化石的途径(例如天然气,煤炭等)的能源效率高于生物质气化途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
站内服务
  • 写作辅导
  • 期刊发表
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号