首页> 外文期刊>International journal of liability and scientific enquiry >Neuroscientific evidence: a criminal justice dream, or an adversarial nightmare?
【24h】

Neuroscientific evidence: a criminal justice dream, or an adversarial nightmare?

机译:神经科学证据:刑事司法之梦还是对抗噩梦?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This exploratory paper seeks to examine the use of neuroscientific evidence in the criminal trial process. Such evidence is not currently employed in the pre-trial or trial stages in England and Wales. However, the first use of polygraph lie detectors during the pre-charge process has recently been trailed by Hertfordshire Police. More advanced techniques such as the BROS test and the use of fMRI scans have been used in international courtrooms, notably in the USA and India. This paper highlights some of the potential conflict with the ECHR, should England and Wales follows suit. Finally, the use of the techniques in a civil setting and the ramifications for the jury trial are also discussed.
机译:该探索性论文旨在研究在刑事审判过程中神经科学证据的使用。目前在英格兰和威尔士的预审阶段或审判阶段未使用此类证据。但是,赫特福德郡警方最近追踪了在预充电过程中首次使用测谎仪测谎仪。 BROS测试和fMRI扫描等更先进的技术已在国际法庭上使用,特别是在美国和印度。如果英格兰和威尔士也效仿,则本文重点介绍了与ECHR的一些潜在冲突。最后,还讨论了这些技术在民事场合的使用以及陪审团审判的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号