首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Economic analysis and optimal design of hydrogen/diesel backup system to improve energy hubs providing the demands of sport complexes
【24h】

Economic analysis and optimal design of hydrogen/diesel backup system to improve energy hubs providing the demands of sport complexes

机译:氢气/柴油备用系统的经济分析与最优设计,改善能量枢纽提供体育综合体需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Energy crisis has led the communities around the world to use energy hubs. These energy hubs usually consist of photovoltics, wind turbines and batteries. Diesel generators are usually used in these systems as backup system. In this research, for the first time, an attempt is made to replace the traditional diesel only backup system with hydrogen only system and combined hydrogen and diesel backup system in hybrid photovoltaic and wind turbine energy systems. After introducing the available energy modeling tools and methods, explaining over advantages and disadvantages of each one, HOMER software was selected for this research. The simulations of this research show that using the traditional diesel generator as the backup system of the energy hub, creates a low cost system with the net present cost (NPC) of 2.5 M$ but also produces the highest amount carbon emission which is equal to 686 tons/year. The results of this study also indicate the hybrid renewable energy system which is supported by the hydrogen only backup system has the highest net present cost (NPC) and initial capital cost but reduces the maximum amount of carbon. The calculated NPC and carbon production of the energy hub using hydrogen only backup system are equal to 4.39 M$ and 55,205, respectively. On the other hand, the combined hydrogen/diesel backup system has reduced NPC compared with the hydrogen only backup system. The CO2 production of this system is also lower than the diesel only backup system. The calculations indicate that the NPC and CO2 production of the combined backup systemare 3.53 M$ and 511,695 kg/yr. By comparing advantages and disadvantages of all 3 scenarios, the micro grid which uses the combined diesel/hydrogen backup system is selected as the most optimal system. The sensitivity analysis of the selected system shows that fluctuations of inflation rate along with the fluctuations of both fuel cells and electrolyzers capital cost do not affect the net present cost (NPC) considerably. On the other hand, fluctuations of capital cost of the main components like wind turbines affect the NPC much more than the others. If the inflation rate drops from 15% to 14% and wind turbine capital cost multiplier reduces from 1 to 0.8, the NPC value will drop by the value of 300,000 $. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:能源危机领导了世界各地的社区来利用能源中心。这些能量轮毂通常由光电电阻,风力涡轮机和电池组成。柴油发电机通常在这些系统中使用作为备份系统。在这项研究中,首次尝试取代传统的柴油,仅用氢电机和风力涡轮能量系统中的氢气和柴油备用系统更换了传统的柴油。在引入可用的能源建模工具和方法后,为本研究选择了众议员软件的解释。本研究的模拟表明,使用传统的柴油发电机作为能量毂的备用系统,创造了低成本系统,净目前的成本(NPC)为2.5米$,但也产生了等于的最高量碳排放量686吨/年。本研究的结果还表明,氢气仅支持备用备用系统的混合可再生能源系统具有最高的净现状(NPC)和初始资本成本,但减少了最大碳量。使用氢的计算的NPC和碳生产使用氢备用系统等于4.39 m $和55,205。另一方面,与仅氢备用系统相比,组合的氢气/柴油备用系统已经降低了NPC。该系统的二氧化碳生产也低于柴油的备用系统。计算表明,NPC和CO2的合并备份系统的生产3.53米至511,695千克/年。通过比较所有3个场景的优缺点,使用组合柴油/氢备备系统的微电网被选为最佳的系统。所选系统的灵敏度分析表明,充气率波动随着燃料电池和电解器资本成本的波动而不会大大影响净目的成本(NPC)。另一方面,像风力涡轮机一样的主要组件的资本成本波动会影响NPC比其他部件更多地影响NPC。如果通胀率下降15%至14%,风力涡轮机资本成本乘数从1到0.8减少,NPC值将减少300,000美元。 (c)2021氢能出版物LLC。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号