首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Geothermal and solar based mutligenerational system: A comparative analysis
【24h】

Geothermal and solar based mutligenerational system: A comparative analysis

机译:地热和太阳能多代系统的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current study focuses on the comparative analyses of multigeneration systems integrated with an electrolyzer for the production of hydrogen, for work rate a regenerative Rankine Cycle and finally for the cooling effect vapor absorption cycle was used. The power produced by both proposed systems was observed to yield some difference based on their positioning in the system and similarly, the rate of hydrogen production from the electrolyzer was also observed. Energetic and exergetic analyses of both the systems are done including all the concerned components. Certain parameters are varied to observe the overall changes in the system along with their effect on the overall efficiencies. A comparative analysis between the two proposed systems was carried out in the present study and eventually providing an efficient system, adding up to the novelty of this publication. At the similar ambient working conditions one of the systems was observed to yield an approximately 0.45% power efficiency difference but when the working parameters were varied, the difference was observed to be abrupt. The electrolyzer has a generation rate of 0.296 g/s and 0.2648 g/s respectively for both systems at base working conditions. At 800 W/m(2) of solar irradiance, the Rankine-Trough-Vapour (RTV) cycle produced 11.77% more net power as compared with Vapour-Trough-Rankine (VTR) cycle. Hydrogen production is considered to be one of the most valuable asset of this analysis because of its immense use in multiple processes. Furthermore, this study suggests the most efficient system for different atmospheric conditions. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:当前的研究集中在与电解装置集成用于产生氢气的多代系统的比较分析上,对于工作速率,使用了再生朗肯循环,最后使用了冷却效果,采用了蒸气吸收循环。观察到两个提议的系统产生的功率基于它们在系统中的位置而产生一些差异,并且类似地,还观察到从电解器产生氢气的速率。对两个系统都进行了包括所有相关组件在内的能量和能量分析。改变某些参数以观察系统的整体变化以及它们对整体效率的影响。在本研究中对两个提议的系统进行了比较分析,最终提供了一个有效的系统,这增加了本出版物的新颖性。在相似的环境工作条件下,观察到其中一个系统产生约0.45%的功率效率差异,但是当工作参数发生变化时,观察到该差异是突然的。对于两个系统,在基本工作条件下,电解槽的产生速率分别为0.296 g / s和0.2648 g / s。在800 W / m(2)的太阳辐射下,朗肯槽蒸汽(RTV)循环产生的净功率比蒸气槽朗肯(VTR)周期高11.77%。氢气生产被认为是该分析中最有价值的资产之一,因为它在多个过程中的大量使用。此外,这项研究提出了针对不同大气条件的最有效系统。 (C)2019氢能出版物有限公司。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号