首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer >Screening improved recovery methods in tight-oil formations by injecting and producing through fractures
【24h】

Screening improved recovery methods in tight-oil formations by injecting and producing through fractures

机译:通过裂缝注入和生产来筛选致密油地层中改进的采收方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tight-oil reservoirs exhibit two characteristic behaviors that limit potential for improved recovery: (ⅰ) limited fluid movement from the unfractured matrix limits the potential to sweep additional oil towards the production wells with injection of a displacing fluid, (ⅱ) the wettability of these reservoirs tend to be oil-wet which holds oil in relatively smaller pores, as compared to gas or water, making it difficult to mobilize that trapped oil. Primary oil production from these formations can decline to half of initial rates in the first year due to low permeability in the unfractured reservoir matrix, and a large amount of unre-covered oil remains in smaller pores that is not able to move out. To address these challenges, this study investigates the potential to improve oil recovery from tight-oil reservoirs by a method that includes injecting a fluid into the fractured reservoir to produce hydrocarbons from adjacent fractures intersecting the same wellbore. The injection and production through fractures has a potential economic advantage over huff-n-puff scheme such that there is no lag-period between injection and production. We compare the estimates of incremental oil recovery obtained by injecting water, immiscible CO_2, and surfactant over the oil recovered by primary depletion (with no injection). The results suggest that injection of fluids may not always improve recovery from tight-oil reservoirs, especially in a heterogeneous reservoir (having different rock types) whose average matrix permeability is lower than 0.01 mD. In cases where recovery is improved over primary depletion, water flood and surfactant flood perform almost equally well with no noticeable difference between the two. Although, surfactant results in favorable fluid properties to mobilize oil, the reason surfactant did not perform well in tight-oil formation studied here is because the unswept oil is inaccessible due to small permeability, and not because of high capillary pressure.
机译:致密油储层表现出两种特征,这限制了提高采收率的潜力:(ⅰ)从未破裂的基质中有限的流体运移限制了注入驱替液将更多的油扫向生产井的潜力,(ⅱ)这些油的润湿性与天然气或水相比,油藏往往是油湿的,将油藏在相对较小的孔隙中,因此很难移动被困的油。由于未破裂的储层基质中的渗透率低,这些地层的初产石油在第一年可能会下降到初始产量的一半,而且大量未采出的石油仍留在较小的孔隙中,无法运出。为了应对这些挑战,本研究通过一种方法研究了提高致密油储层采收率的潜力,该方法包括将流体注入裂缝性储层中,以从与同一井眼相交的相邻裂缝中开采出碳氢化合物。通过裂缝进行的注入和生产比起哈夫-n-puff方案具有潜在的经济优势,因此在注入和生产之间没有滞后时间。我们比较通过注入水,不混溶的CO_2和表面活性剂获得的增量采收率的估算值,该估算值是通过一次开采(不注入)获得的采油率。结果表明,注入流体可能并不总是能改善致密油储层的采收率,特别是在平均基质渗透率低于0.01 mD的非均质储层(岩石类型不同)中。如果通过一次枯竭改善了采收率,则水驱和表面活性剂驱的性能几乎相同,两者之间没有显着差异。尽管表面活性剂产生了良好的流动性以移动油,但此处研究的表面活性剂在致密油形成中表现不佳的原因是未渗透的油由于渗透率低而不易进入,而不是因为毛细管压力高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号