首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer >Double wall cooling of an effusion plate with cross flow and impingement jet combination internal cooling: Comparisons of main flow contraction ratio effects
【24h】

Double wall cooling of an effusion plate with cross flow and impingement jet combination internal cooling: Comparisons of main flow contraction ratio effects

机译:带有交叉流和冲击射流组合内部冷却的积水板的双壁冷却:主流收缩率效应的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study considers comparisons of hot-side effusion plate results for a mainstream flow passage with CR = 1 and for a mainstream flow passage with CR = 4. The coolant supply arrangement for both CR contraction ratio values includes simultaneous use of cross flow and an impingement jet array. For the effusion cooled/hot surface, presented are spatially-resolved distributions of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, and surface heat transfer coefficients (measured using infrared thermography). These results are given for main flow Reynolds numbers Re_(ms) of 89,900 to 95,800. For this main flow Reynolds number range, four different combination values of crossflow Reynolds number and impingement Reynolds number are tested for each CR value, which are associated with four different values of initial blowing ratio BR. With this arrangement, crossflow Reynolds number is varied, as impingement jet Reynolds number is approximately constant. The resulting variations of surface adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and surface heat transfer coefficients are due to three competing phenomena, whose relative influences change with x/d_e location. These include increased turbulent mixing and transport result from effusion coolant jets, decreased magnitudes of local blowing ratio with streamwise location, and significant streamwise acceleration, which induces local boundary layer re-laminarization. When the CR = 4 arrangement is employed, these phenomena result in dramatic decreases of local and line-averaged heat transfer coefficients, and local and line-averaged adiabatic film effectiveness magnitudes, with streamwise development, for x/d_e > 60. Resulting values are then significantly lower than when CR = 1, provided comparisons are made at a particular streamwise location for each value of initial blowing ratio BR.
机译:本研究考虑了CR = 1的主流流路和CR = 4的主流流路的热侧积水板结果的比较。两种CR收缩率值的冷却剂供应装置包括同时使用错流和回流。冲击射流阵列。对于流出的冷却/热表面,给出了表面绝热膜冷却效率的空间分辨分布,以及表面传热系数(使用红外热像仪测量)。对于主流雷诺数Re_(ms)为89,900至95,800给出了这些结果。对于该主流雷诺数范围,针对每个CR值测试了横流雷诺数和冲击雷诺数的四个不同组合值,它们与初始吹风比BR的四个不同值相关联。通过这种布置,因为冲击射流雷诺数近似恒定,所以横流雷诺数变化。表面绝热膜冷却效率和表面传热系数的最终变化是由于三种相互竞争的现象,它们的相对影响随x / d_e位置而变化。这些包括由积液冷却剂射流引起的湍流混合和输送增加,随流向位置减小的局部鼓风比的大小,以及沿流向的明显加速,这引起了局部边界层的重新分层。当采用CR = 4布置时,这些现象会导致局部和线平均传热系数显着降低,并且对于x / d_e> 60,沿流向发展,局部和线平均绝热膜的有效幅度随流向发展。如果在初始喷射比BR的每个值的特定流向位置进行比较,则该值显着低于CR = 1时的值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号