首页> 外文期刊>International journal of digital multimedia broadcasting >Subjective Evaluation of Music Compressed with the ACER Codec Compared to AAC, MP3, and Uncompressed PCM
【24h】

Subjective Evaluation of Music Compressed with the ACER Codec Compared to AAC, MP3, and Uncompressed PCM

机译:与ACER编解码器压缩的音乐的主观评估与AAC,MP3和未压缩PCM相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Audio data compression has revolutionised the way in which the music industry and musicians sell and distribute their products. Our previous research presented a novel codec named ACER (Audio Compression Exploiting Repetition), which achieves data reduction by exploiting irrelevancy and redundancy in musical structure whilst generally maintaining acceptable levels of noise and distortion in objective evaluations. However, previous work did not evaluate ACER using subjective listening tests, leaving a gap to demonstrate its applicability under human audio perception tests. In this paper, we present a double-blind listening test that was conducted with a range of listeners (N=100). The aim was to determine the efficacy of the ACER codec, in terms of perceptible noise and spatial distortion artefacts, against de facto standards for audio data compression and an uncompressed reference. Results show that participants reported no perceived differences between the uncompressed, MP3, AAC, ACER high quality, and ACER medium quality compressed audio in terms of noise and distortions but that the ACER low quality format was perceived as being of lower quality. However, in terms of participants' perceptions of the stereo field, all formats under test performed as well as each other, with no statistically significant differences. A qualitative, thematic analysis of listeners' feedback revealed that the noise artefacts that produced the ACER technique are different from those of comparator codecs, reflecting its novel approach. Results show that the quality of contemporary audio compression systems has reached a stage where their performance is perceived to be as good as uncompressed audio. The ACER format is able to compete as an alternative, with results showing a preference for the ACER medium quality versions over WAV, MP3, and AAC. The ACER process itself is viable on its own or in conjunction with techniques such as MP3 and AAC.
机译:音频数据压缩已经彻底改变了音乐行业和音乐家销售和分配产品的方式。我们以前的研究提出了一种名为宏碁(音频压缩开发重复)的新型编解码器(音频压缩开发重复),这通过在音乐结构中利用无关和冗余来实现数据,而通常在客观评估中保持可接受的噪声和失真水平。但是,以前的工作没有使用主观听力测试评估宏碁,留下差距来展示其在人类音频感知测试下的适用性。在本文中,我们介绍了一系列听众(n = 100)进行的双盲听力测试。目的是在可察觉的噪声和空间失真伪影方面确定宏碁编解码器的功效,反对关于音频数据压缩的事实标准和未压缩的参考。结果表明,参与者在噪声和扭曲方面报告了未压缩,MP3,AAC,AC,宏碁高质量和宏碁介质压缩音频之间的感知差异,但宏碁低质量格式被认为是较低的质量。然而,就参与者对立体声领域的看法,所有测试的格式也彼此进行,没有统计学上的差异。对听众反馈的定性,主题分析揭示了产生宏碁技术的噪声假文件与比较器编解码器的噪声伪影不同,反映了其新的方法。结果表明,当代音频压缩系统的质量已达到其性能被认为与未压缩音频一样好。宏碁格式能够作为替代方案竞争,结果显示了WAV,MP3和AAC的宏碁中质量版本的偏好。宏碁过程本身是自行的或与MP3和AAC等技术一起可行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号