首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computational intelligence theory and practice >POPI: A USER-LEVEL TOOL FOR INFERRING ROUTER PACKET FORWARDING PRIORITY
【24h】

POPI: A USER-LEVEL TOOL FOR INFERRING ROUTER PACKET FORWARDING PRIORITY

机译:popi:用于推断路由器包转发优先级的用户级工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Packet forwarding prioritization (PFP) in routers is one of the mechanisms commonly available to network operators. PFP can have a significant impact on the accuracy of network measurements, the performance of applications and the effectiveness of network troubleshooting procedures. Despite its potential impacts, no information on PFP settings is readily available to end users. In this paper, we present an end-to-end approach for PFP inference and its associated tool, POPI. This is the first attempt to infer router packet forwarding priority through end-to-end measurement. POPI enables users to discover such network policies through measurements of packet losses of different packet types. We evaluated our approach via statistical analysis, simulation and wide-area experimentation in PlanetLab. We employed POPI to analyze 156 paths among 162 PlanetLab sites. POPI flagged 15 paths with multiple priorities, 13 of which were further validated through hop-by-hop loss rates measurements. In addition, we surveyed all related network operators and received responses for about half of them all confirming our inferences. Besides, we compared POPI with the inference mechanisms through other metrics such as packet reordering [called out-of-order (OOO)J. OOO is unable to find many priority paths such as those implemented via traffic policing. On the other hand, interestingly, we found it can detect existence of the mechanisms which induce delay differences among packet types such as slow processing path in the router and port-based load sharing.
机译:路由器中的数据包转发优先级(PFP)是网络运营商通常可用的机制之一。 PFP可能对网络测量的准确性,应用程序的性能和网络故障排除程序的有效性产生重大影响。尽管有其潜在的影响,但最终用户无需了解有关PFP设置的信息。在本文中,我们为PFP推理及其相关工具提供了一种端到端的方法POPI。这是第一次尝试通过端到端测量推断路由器分组转发优先级。 POPI使用户能够通过测量不同数据包类型的数据包丢失来发现此类网络策略。我们通过PlanetLab中的统计分析,仿真和广域实验进行了评估了我们的方法。我们雇用了Popi分析了162个PlanetLab网站之间的156条路径。 Popi标记了具有多个优先级的15个路径,其中13个通过逐跳损失测量进一步验证。此外,我们调查了所有相关的网络运营商,并收到了大约一半的回复,所有这些都确认了我们的推论。此外,我们将Popi与推理机制进行比较通过其他度量,例如数据包重新排序[被叫无序(OOO)j。 OOO无法找到许多优先级路径,例如通过流量监管实现的路径。另一方面,有趣的是,我们发现它可以检测到存在诱导数据包类型延迟差异的机制的存在,例如路由器和基于端口的负载共享中的慢处理路径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号