首页> 外文期刊>International journal of cloud applications and computing >Multi-Factor Performance Comparison of Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cluster and Google Cloud Platform Compute Engine
【24h】

Multi-Factor Performance Comparison of Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cluster and Google Cloud Platform Compute Engine

机译:亚马逊Web服务弹性计算群集和Google云平台计算引擎的多因素性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cloud computing has rapidly become a viable competitor to on-premise infrastructure from both management and cost perspectives. This research provides insight into cluster computing performance and variability in cloud-provisioned infrastructure from two popular public cloud providers. A comparative examination of the two cloud platforms using synthetic benchmarks is provided. In this article, we compared the performance of Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cluster (EC2) to the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Compute Engine using three benchmarks: STREAM, IOR, and NPB-EP. Experiments were conducted on clusters with increasing nodes from one to eight. We also performed experiments over the course of two weeks where benchmarks were run at similar times. The benchmarks provided performance metrics for bandwidth (STREAM), read and write performance (IOR), and operations per second (NPB-EP). We found that EC2 outperformed GCP for bandwidth. Both provided good scalability and reliability for bandwidth with GCP showing a slight deviation during the two-week trial. GCP outperformed EC2 in both the read and write tests (IOR) as well as the operations per second test. However, GCP was extremely variable during the read and write tests over the two-week trial. Overall, each platform excelled in different benchmarks and we found EC2 to be more reliable in general.
机译:云计算从管理和成本观点迅速成为现场基础设施的可行竞争对手。本研究为来自两个流行的公共云提供商的云配置基础架构中的集群计算性能和可变性提供了深入了解。提供了使用合成基准的两个云平台的比较检查。在本文中,我们将亚马逊Web服务弹性计算群集(EC2)的性能与Google云平台(GCP)计算出使用三个基准:Stream,IOR和NPB-EP。实验在簇中进行,其中节点从一到八点增加。我们还在两周内进行了实验,其中基准在类似时间运行。基准测试为带宽(流),读写性能(IOR)和每秒操作(NPB-EP)提供了性能指标。我们发现EC2为带宽而表现出GCP。两者都为带宽提供了良好的可扩展性和可靠性,其中GCP显示在为期两周的试验期间略有偏差。 GCP在读取和写入测试(IOR)中表现出EC2,以及每秒测试的操作。但是,在两周试验中,GCP在读写测试期间非常变化。总的来说,每个平台都在不同的基准中表现出色,我们发现EC2通常更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号