首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Civil Engineering,Transaction A:Civil Engineering >Seismic response of multi-span continuous irregular bridges using displacement-based and conventional force-based methods
【24h】

Seismic response of multi-span continuous irregular bridges using displacement-based and conventional force-based methods

机译:基于位移和常规力的方法的多跨连续不规则桥的地震响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the recent years, the displacement-based seismic design (DBD) method of structures has been recognized as the alternative design method to the conventional force-based seismic design (FBD) method. The problems inherited in the FBD method are mostly overcome by the DBD method as it better correlates the structural damage with displacement-based quantities. In this study, the seismic response of multi-span bridges with varying number of spans and unequal pier heights was evaluated using the DBD method and compared with the conventional FBD method. Two approaches were employed in the DBD method, such as the traditional direct displacement-based seismic design (DDBD) approach and the proposed approach in this study entitled as alternative-to-direct displacement-based seismic design (ADBD). For seismic evaluation of the bridge structures with the FBD method, acceleration response spectra as suggested in the Bangladesh National Building Code were used; while in the DBD method, displacement response spectra for different damping ratios were developed keeping consistency with the above-mentioned design acceleration spectra. Five bridge models were used in the analysis to compare the seismic response in both the longitudinal and transverse directions taking into account the number of spans and height irregularity in the bridge models. Numerical analysis showed very obvious results that the base shear calculated by both approaches of the DBD method is found to be smaller than the FBD method indicating that an economic member section be attained for meeting the same design objective. More specifically, the ADBD approach provides the design professionals a more conservative design approach in compared with the DDBD approach keeping an economic design approach comparing with the FBD method.
机译:近年来,基于位移的地震设计(DBD)的结构方法已经被认为是传统的基于力的地震设计(FBD)方法的替代设计方法。在FBD方法中继承的问题主要由DBD方法克服,因为它更好地将结构损伤与基于位移的数量相关联。在该研究中,使用DBD方法评估具有不同数量的跨越和不等码码高度的多跨桥的地震响应,并与传统的FBD方法进行比较。在DBD方法中采用了两种方法,例如传统的直接位移的地震设计(DDBD)方法以及本研究中的提出方法标题为替代直接位移的地震设计(ADBD)。对于使用FBD方法的桥梁结构的地震评价,使用了孟加拉国国家建筑码中所建议的加速响应光谱;虽然在DBD方法中,用于不同阻尼比的位移响应光谱与上述设计加速度谱产生一致性。在分析中使用了五种桥梁模型,以比较纵向和横向的地震反应,考虑到桥梁模型中的跨度和高度不规则性的跨度和高度不规则。数值分析显示出非常明显的结果,发现通过DBD方法的两种方法计算的基础剪切小于FBD方法,表明经济成员部分符合相同的设计目标。更具体地说,ADBD方法提供了设计专业人员更保守的设计方法,与DDBD方法保持与FBD方法进行比较的经济设计方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号