首页> 外文期刊>International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics >Regional economic regimes and the environment: stronger institutional design is weakening environmental policy capacity of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
【24h】

Regional economic regimes and the environment: stronger institutional design is weakening environmental policy capacity of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation

机译:区域经济体制和环境:强有力的制度设计削弱了南亚区域合作协会的环境政策能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

International environmental governance by global and, especially, regional regimes is gaining attention in both political practice and academia. We study the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation's (SAARC) regime for economic integration. Based on qualitative data for 1985-2017 from key regime and policy documents and interviews, we propose the following. Besides issue-related institutional design and the resulting regime structures, the policies and policy capacities developed within a particular regime make the regime an environmental one. We analyze the environmental policy SAARC developed within the formal institutional framework between 1985 and 2017. The results show that institutional design, particularly membership and control issues, is a highly political affair, given China's ambition to join the agreement as well as the struggle between Pakistan and India for hegemony. In 2010, the SAARC Convention on Cooperation on Environment formally extended the regime's scope. The preceding environmental policy and its related capacities were fragmented and strongly built on decentralized, issue-specific environmental SAARC centers in different member states. The 2010 Convention on Cooperation on Environment streamlined this environmental policy but reduced the issue-specific policy capacities of the regime. We conclude that the formalization of environmental regimes into stronger institutional designs does not necessarily lead to stronger environmental regime policies and capacities. The proposed conceptual distinction between regime structure and regime policy will enable future regime studies to combine international relations, policy analysis, and comparative government methodologies when examining the policies of regimes and their dynamics.
机译:全球特别是区域制度进行的国际环境治理在政治实践和学术界都越来越受到关注。我们研究了南亚区域合作联盟(SAARC)的经济一体化体制。基于关键政权和政策文件以及访谈中1985-2017年的定性数据,我们提出以下建议。除了与问题相关的制度设计和由此产生的制度结构外,在特定制度内制定的政策和政策能力使该制度成为一种环境制度。我们分析了1985年至2017年在正式体制框架内制定的SAARC环境政策。结果表明,鉴于中国加入该协议的雄心以及巴基斯坦与巴基斯坦之间的斗争,体制设计(尤其是成员资格和控制问题)是高度政治事务。和印度霸权。 2010年,《南盟环境合作公约》正式扩大了该制度的范围。先前的环境政策及其相关能力是分散的,并以分散在各个成员国,针对特定问题的环境SAARC中心为基础。 2010年《环境合作公约》简化了该环境政策,但降低了该制度针对特定问题的政策能力。我们得出的结论是,将环境制度正式化为更强大的制度设计并不一定会导致更强大的环境制度政策和能力。提议的政权结构和政权政策之间的概念区别将使未来的政权研究能够在审查政权政策及其动态时结合国际关系,政策分析和比较性政府方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号