首页> 外文期刊>Interiors: design, architecture and culture >Seductiwa Discourses: Design Adwice for the Home-An Introduction
【24h】

Seductiwa Discourses: Design Adwice for the Home-An Introduction

机译:Seductiwa话语:家居设计建议-简介

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This special issue of Interiors examines the role of design advice for the home from the 1870s to 1970, and recognizes its significance in shaping contemporary and historical perceptions and representations of the domestic sphere. Readers will find articles focusing on the late nineteenth century in Britain, and articles addressing the postwar period in Europe, Africa and the United States. Contributors based in the UK, USA and Germany include a range of scholars across institutions and disciplines: design, design history, gender and social history. There are common issues among the articles in the discussions of similar modes of advice and their purposes, but also interesting differences, such as the type of media used, matters of authorship and the audiences targeted. Perhaps contrary to some readers' expectations, none of the articles attempts to uncover real interiors and practice from the advice studied and they search instead for the ideological underpinnings and cultural significance of these discourses. It is possible this is in response to earlier publications by design historians Grace Lees-Maffei and Emma Ferry, in which both examined at length the problems of taking advice literature as direct evidence of practice. We would particularly want to highlight the special issue devoted to domestic advice, published by the Journal of Design History in 2003, where its editor Lees-Maffei and contributors Penny Sparke, Emma Ferry, Rachel Rich, and Frances Collard discussed the merits and efficacy of advice as a discourse on design and domesticity.
机译:本期《室内设计》专刊探讨了1870年代至1970年间房屋设计建议的作用,并认识到其在塑造当代和历史上对家居领域的看法和表示的意义。读者会发现针对英国的19世纪末期的文章,以及针对欧洲,非洲和美国战后时期的文章。来自英国,美国和德国的贡献者包括不同机构和学科的众多学者:设计,设计历史,性别和社会历史。在讨论类似建议的方式及其目的时,文章之间存在一些共同的问题,但也存在有趣的差异,例如所使用的媒体类型,作者身份和目标受众。也许与某些读者的预期相反,这些文章都没有试图从所研究的建议中揭示真实的内饰和实践,而是寻找这些话语的意识形态基础和文化意义。这可能是对设计历史学家Grace Lees-Maffei和Emma Ferry较早发表的出版物的回应,他们均详细研究了将建议文献作为实践直接证据的问题。我们尤其要特别强调一下专门针对国内建议的特殊问题,该问题于2003年由《设计历史》杂志出版,其编辑Lees-Maffei和撰稿人Penny Sparke,Emma Ferry,Rachel Rich和Frances Collard讨论了该产品的优点和功效。建议作为关于设计和家庭性的论述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号