首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems >Cost-Profit Trade-Off for Optimally Locating Automotive Service Firms Under Uncertainty
【24h】

Cost-Profit Trade-Off for Optimally Locating Automotive Service Firms Under Uncertainty

机译:成本利润折衷,以便在不确定性下最佳定位汽车服务公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This work investigates the problem of optimally locating an automotive service firm (ASF) subject to stochastic customer demands, varying setup cost and regional constraints. The goal is to minimize the transportation cost while maintaining the specified profit of the ASF. This work studies two variants of the problem: ASF location with known demand probability distributions and with partial demand information, i.e., only the support and mean of the customer demands are known. For the former, a chance-constrained program is formulated that improves an existing model, and then an equivalent deterministic nonlinear program is constructed based on our property analysis results. For the latter, a novel distribution-free model is developed. The proposed models are solved by solver LINGO. Computational results on the benchmark examples show that: i) for the first variant, the proposed approach outperforms the existing one; ii) for the second one, the proposed distribution-free model can effectively handle stochastic customer demands without complete probability distributions; and iii) the results of the distribution-free model are slightly worse than those of the deterministic nonlinear one, but the former is more cost-efficient for the practical ASF location as it is less expensive in obtaining demand information. Moreover, the proposed models and approaches are extended to address a multi-ASF location allocation under demand uncertainty.
机译:这项工作调查了最佳地定位汽车服务公司(ASF)的问题,而是通过随机客户需求,不同的设置成本和区域限制。目标是尽量减少运输成本,同时保持ASF的规定利润。这项工作研究了问题的两个变体:ASF位置具有已知的需求概率分布和部分需求信息,即,仅仅是客户需求的支持和平均值。对于前者,制定了一个机会约束程序,从而改善了现有模型,然后基于我们的属性分析结果构建了等效的确定性非线性程序。对于后者,开发了一种新的无分布模型。拟议的模型由求解器Lingo解决。基准示例的计算结果显示:i)对于第一个变体,所提出的方法优于现有的方法; ii)对于第二个,建议的无分布模型可以有效地处理随机客户需求而无需完整的概率分布; III)分布模型的结果略差于确定性非线性的模型,但是前者对于实际的ASF位置更具成本效益,因为它在获得需求信息方面昂贵。此外,延长了所提出的模型和方法以解决需求不确定性的多ASF位置分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号