首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >The Middle-Class Nature of Identity and its Implications for Education: A Genealogical Analysis and Reevaluation of a Culturally and Historically Bounded Concept
【24h】

The Middle-Class Nature of Identity and its Implications for Education: A Genealogical Analysis and Reevaluation of a Culturally and Historically Bounded Concept

机译:身份的中产阶级性质及其对教育的启示:对文化和历史界定概念的家谱分析和重新评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider identity as a historically emerging discourse that requires genealogical analysis ― not to discover the roots of our identity but to commit [ourselves] to its dissipation (Foucault 1977, p. 162). We suggest analyzing identity through the history of socio-economic classes, their life struggles, ambitions, development, and reproduction. We see learning not as a project of transformation of identity, but rather as developing access to socially valuable practices and developing one‘s own voice within these practices (through addressing and responding to other voices). The access and voice projects free agents from unnecessary finalization and objectivization by oneself and others (Bakhtin 1999; Bakhtin 1990). In education, we should develop indigenous discourses of learning and develop a conceptual framework that makes analysis of diverse discourses possible. We argue that learning, as transformation of participation in a sociocultural practice to gain more access, is a better conceptual framework than learning as transformation of identity.
机译:我们认为身份是一种历史新兴的话语,需要进行族谱分析-不是发现我们身份的根源,而是致力于[自身]消散身份(Foucault 1977,第162页)。我们建议通过社会经济阶级的历史,他们的生活斗争,野心,发展和繁殖来分析身份。我们认为学习不是转变身份的项目,而是发展对社会有价值的实践的访问,并在这些实践中发展自己的声音(通过应对和回应其他声音)。接入和语音项目使代理免于自己和他人不必要的终结和客观化(Bakhtin 1999; Bakhtin 1990)。在教育中,我们应该发展土著学习的话语,并发展一个概念框架,使对各种话语的分析成为可能。我们认为,学习作为改变社会文化习俗以获取更多机会的一种手段,比学习作为身份认同的转变是一种更好的概念框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号