首页> 外文期刊>Insight >Evaluation of indication detected in high-thickness welds: comparison between traditional methods and new technologies
【24h】

Evaluation of indication detected in high-thickness welds: comparison between traditional methods and new technologies

机译:高厚度焊缝中痕迹的评估:传统方法与新技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the field of advanced ultrasonic techniques, the potential of new technologies in terms of sensitivity and accuracy in locating and sizing of indications has opened up new horizons in the inspection of high-thickness pressure vessels. The relevance of these new technologies is that now we can obtain more precise information on the weld defects that will allow the acceptance of flaws larger than those permitted applying traditional inspection criteria and that will permit flaws to be monitored in subsequent inspections with a high level of confidence. This progress in detection and measure systems should not tempt us into neglecting traditional methodologies: Code Case 2235 still considers PT, MT or ET inspection to be more effective in detecting surface flaws, and manual ultrasonic techniques appear necessary to provide information about the type of internal indications. Regarding the latter, although Code Case 2235 acceptance criteria do not require characterisation of the indication, we believe that knowledge of the type discontinuity (for example distinguishing planar from volumetric flaws) is necessary, especially for planning periodic inspections over the life of the pressure vessel.
机译:在先进的超声技术领域中,在适应性和定位指示尺寸方面的敏感性和准确性方面,新技术的潜力为检查高厚度压力容器开辟了新的视野。这些新技术的相关性在于,现在我们可以获得有关焊接缺陷的更精确的信息,这些信息将允许接受比采用传统检查标准所允许的更大的缺陷,并允许在后续检查中以较高的水平对缺陷进行监控。置信度。检测和测量系统的这一进步不应诱使我们忽略传统方法:代码案例2235仍然认为PT,MT或ET检查在检测表面缺陷方面更有效,并且似乎有必要使用手动超声技术来提供有关内部类型的信息。适应症。关于后者,尽管代码案例2235的接受标准不需要对指示进行表征,但我们认为,必须了解类型不连续性(例如,将平面缺陷与体积缺陷区分开),特别是对于计划在压力容器的使用寿命内进行定期检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号