Federal appeals court sets March 20 oralrnargument in broad challenge to Order 1000

Bobby McMahon

首页> 外文期刊>Inside FERC >Federal appeals court sets March 20 oralrnargument in broad challenge to Order 1000

【24h】

Federal appeals court sets March 20 oralrnargument in broad challenge to Order 1000

机译：联邦上诉法院在3月20日对1000号命令提出广泛质疑

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A federal appeals court last week scheduled oral argument inrna closely watched suit over Order 1000, FERC’s landmark transmissionrnplanning and cost-allocation rule.

机译：上周，一家联邦上诉法院安排了口头辩论inrna，密切关注着关于FERC划时代的传输计划和成本分配规则的命令1000。

著录项

来源
《Inside FERC》 |2014年第127期|6-7|共2页
作者
Bobby McMahon;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Federal appeals court opinion on challenge to EPA standard under safe drinking water act decided March 31,2000 [J] . Chemical Regulation Group Chemical Regulation Reporter . 2000,第14期

机译：联邦上诉法院关于根据安全饮用水法案对EPA标准提出质疑的意见于2000年3月31日判决
2. Federal appeals court sets Nov. 4 court date for Dakota Access Pipeline fight [J] . Jordan Blum Platt's Oilgram News . 2020,第186期

机译：联邦上诉法院于11月4日达科他访问管道战斗的法院日期
3. Regents of Univ. of California v. Broad Inst., Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2018 903 F.3d 1286 [J] . Holman Christopher M. Biotechnology Law Report . 2018,第6期

机译：大学的居民。加利福尼亚州v。宽阔的Inst。，Inc。美国上诉法院联邦电路，2018年903 F.3d 1286
4. BACK TO THE FUTURE? DID THE FEDERAL APPEALS COURT RULE CORRECTLY ON FLOW CONTROL IN THE ONEIDA-HERKIMER CASE? [C] . David Biderman SWANA(Solid Waste Association of North America)'s 39th Annual International Solid Waste Exposition, Oct 15-18, 2001, Baltimore, Maryland . 2001

机译：回到未来？在oneidaa-herkimer案中，联邦上诉法院规则是否正确地控制了流量？
5. The impact of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on federal administrative agencies, 1954-1990. [D] . Spriggs, James Frederick, II. 1994

机译：1954年至1990年，最高法院和哥伦比亚特区上诉法院对联邦行政机构的影响。
6. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

Federal appeals court sets March 20 oralrnargument in broad challenge to Order 1000

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅