Ardent realism without referential normativity

摘要

This paper addresses a central positive claim in Matti Eklund's Choosing Normative Concepts: that a certain kind of metaphysically ambitious realist about normativity - the ardent realist - is committed to the metasemantic idea that the distinctive inferential role of normative concepts suffices to fix the extension of those concepts. I argue first that commitment to this sort of inferential role metasemantic view does nothing to secure ardent realism. I then show how the ardent realist can address Eklund's leading challenge without appeal to distinctively metasemantic commitments.