首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >Logic isn't normative
【24h】

Logic isn't normative

机译:逻辑不是规范性的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Some writers object to logical pluralism on the grounds that logic is normative. The rough idea is that the relation of logical consequence has consequences for what we ought to think and how we ought to reason, so that pluralism about the consequence relation would result in an incoherent or unattractive pluralism about those things. In this paper I argue that logic isn't normative. I distinguish three different ways in which a theory - such as a logical theory - can be entangled with the normative and argue that logic is only entangled in the weakest of these ways, one which requires it to have no normativity of its own. I use this view to show what is wrong with three different arguments for the conclusion that logic is normative.
机译:一些作家以逻辑是规范性为由反对逻辑多元论。粗略的想法是,逻辑结果关系对我们应该思考的内容和我们应该如何推理产生影响,因此,关于结果关系的多元性将导致这些事物的不连贯或缺乏吸引力的多元性。在本文中,我认为逻辑不是规范性的。我区分了一种理论(例如逻辑理论)可以与规范进行纠缠的三种不同方式,并认为逻辑仅以这些方式中最弱的一种进行纠缠,这要求逻辑不具有自己的规范性。我用这种观点来说明三种不同论点的错误之处,以得出逻辑是规范性的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号