首页> 外文期刊>INFORMS journal on computing >Methodologies for evaluation of note-based music-retrieval systems
【24h】

Methodologies for evaluation of note-based music-retrieval systems

机译:评估基于音符的音乐检索系统的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There have been many proposed music-retrieval systems, based on a variety of principles. How the effectiveness of these systems compares is not clear. The evaluation of some systems has been informal, without the rigor applied in other areas of information retrieval, and comparison of systems is difficult because of the lack of a common data set, queries, or relevance judgments. In this paper we explain how we collected artificial and expert music queries and name-based relevance judgments, and describe software we developed for collection of manual relevance judgments. Together with a collection of downloaded musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) files, these sets of queries and relevance judgments provide valuable tools for measuring music-retrieval systems. As an example of the value of these tools, we use them to compare the effect of using the expert queries and manual judgments to that of the artificial queries and manual judgments used in our earlier experiments.
机译:基于各种原理,已经提出了许多提议的音乐检索系统。这些系统的有效性如何比较尚不清楚。对某些系统的评估是非正式的,没有在信息检索的其他领域应用严格的准则,并且由于缺乏通用的数据集,查询或相关性判断,因此很难进行系统比较。在本文中,我们解释了如何收集人工音乐和专家音乐查询以及基于名称的相关性判断,并描述了为收集手工相关性判断而开发的软件。这些查询集和相关性判断集与下载的乐器数字接口(MIDI)文件一起,为测量音乐检索系统提供了有价值的工具。作为这些工具价值的一个示例,我们使用它们来比较使用专家查询和手动判断的效果与我们早期实验中使用的人工查询和手动判断的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号