...
首页> 外文期刊>Information technology and libraries >MetaSearching and Beyond: Implementation Experiences and Advice from an Academic Library
【24h】

MetaSearching and Beyond: Implementation Experiences and Advice from an Academic Library

机译:元搜索及其之外:高校图书馆的实施经验和建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In March 2003 the University of Mississippi Libraries made our MetaSearch tool publicly available. After a year of working with this product and integrating it into the library Web site, a wide variety of libraries interested in our implementation process and experiences began to call. Libraries interested in this product have included consor-tia, public, and academic libraries in the United States, Mexico, and Europe. This article was written in an effort to share the recommendations and concerns given. Much of the advice is general and could be applied to many of the MetaSearch tools available. Google Scholar and other open Web initiatives that could impact the future of MetaSearching are also discussed. Many libraries are looking for ways to facilitate the discovery process for users. Implementing a one-stop search product that does not require database-specific knowledge is one of the paths libraries are choosing.1 As these search engines are made available to patrons, the burden of design falls to the library as well as to the product developers. Most library users may be familiar with a few databases, but the vast majority of electronic resources remain unrevealed. Using a MetaSearch product, a single search is broadcast out to similar and divergent electronic resources, and search results are returned and typically mixed together. MetaSearch results are returned in real-time and link the user to the native interface. Although there are many products that support one-stop searching, the University of Mississippi Libraries chose to purchase Innovative Interfaces' MetaFind product because it tied into a digital initiative partnership with Innovative.
机译:2003年3月,密西西比大学大学图书馆公开了我们的MetaSearch工具。在使用该产品并将其集成到图书馆网站一年后,对我们的实施过程和经验感兴趣的各种各样的图书馆开始出现。对这个产品感兴趣的图书馆包括美国,墨西哥和欧洲的consortia,公共和学术图书馆。本文旨在共享建议和关注的问题。大多数建议都是一般性建议,可以应用于许多可用的MetaSearch工具。还讨论了可能会影响MetaSearching未来的Google Scholar和其他开放式Web计划。许多图书馆正在寻找促进用户发现过程的方法。实现不需要数据库特定知识的一站式搜索产品是图书馆选择的途径之一。1由于这些搜索引擎可供顾客使用,设计的负担落在图书馆以及产品开发人员身上。大多数图书馆用户可能都熟悉一些数据库,但是绝大多数电子资源仍未公开。使用MetaSearch产品,单个搜索将广播到相似且不同的电子资源,然后返回搜索结果,通常将它们混合在一起。 MetaSearch结果将实时返回,并将用户链接到本机界面。尽管有许多产品支持一站式搜索,但密西西比大学图书馆选择购买Innovative Interfaces的MetaFind产品,因为它与Innovative建立了数字主动合作关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号