首页> 外文期刊>Information Resources Management Journal >Matching Facilitator Style and Agenda Structure in Group Support Systems: Effects on Participant Satisfaction and Group Ouput Quality
【24h】

Matching Facilitator Style and Agenda Structure in Group Support Systems: Effects on Participant Satisfaction and Group Ouput Quality

机译:小组支持系统中协调人风格和议程结构的匹配:对参与者满意度和小组输出质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 2x2 factorial controlled experiment was conducted to examine the effects of agenda structure and facilitator style on participant satisfaction and output quality in meetings employing group support systems (GSS.) Participants were assigned to one of four conditions: (1) relationship style/relationship agenda; (2) task style/task agenda; (3) task style/relationship agenda; and (4) relationship style/task agenda. As expected, satisfaction with the agenda, process, and outcomes was higher in the matched style/agenda conditions (1) and (2.) Surprisingly, satisfaction with facilitation and task was higher in the relationship style conditions (1) and (4.) Two expert raters were used to judge the quality of group outputs. As predicted, groups in the matched conditions produced higher quality outputs than groups in the mismatched conditions. Implications of the study for practice and future research are provided. This study is part of an ongoing program of research into the effectiveness of GSS as a tool for conducting meetings and other forms of group activity.
机译:进行了2x2阶乘控制的实验,以检查议程结构和主持人风格对采用小组支持系统(GSS)的会议的参与者满意度和输出质量的影响。与会者被分配到以下四个条件之一:(1)关系风格/关系议程; (2)任务风格/任务议程; (3)任务风格/关系议程; (4)关系风格/任务议程。正如预期的那样,在匹配的样式/议程条件(1)和(2)中,对议程,过程和结果的满意度较高。令人惊讶的是,在关系样式的条件(1)和(4)中,对促进和任务的满意度较高。 )使用了两个专家评分者来判断小组输出的质量。如预测的那样,匹配条件下的组比不匹配条件下的组产生更高的质量输出。提供了该研究对实践和未来研究的启示。这项研究是正在进行的研究计划的一部分,该计划研究GSS作为进行会议和其他形式的团体活动的工具的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号