首页> 外文期刊>Information and computation >Fair multi-party contract signing using private contract signatures
【24h】

Fair multi-party contract signing using private contract signatures

机译:使用私有合同签名进行公平的多方合同签名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A multi-party contract signing protocol allows a set of participants to exchange messages with each other with a view to arriving in a state in which each of them has a pre-agreed contract text signed by all the others. Garay and Mackenzie (GM) proposed such protocol based on private contract signatures, but it was later shown to be flawed by Chadha, Kremer and Scedrov (CKS); the authors CKS also provided a fix to the GM protocol by revising one of its sub-protocols. We show an attack on the revised GM protocol for any number (n > 4) of signers. Furthermore, we argue that our attack shows that the message exchange structure of GM's main protocol is flawed: whatever the trusted party does will result in unfairness for some signer. This means that it is impossible to define a trusted party protocol for Garay and MacKenzie's main protocol; we call this "resolve-impossibility". We propose a new optimistic multi-party contract signing protocol, also based on private contract signatures. We present a proof that our protocol satisfies fairness as well as its formal analysis in NuSMV model checker for the case of five signers. The protocol requires n(n - 1)([n/2] + 1) messages to be sent in the optimistic execution, which is about half the number of messages required by the state-of-the-art Baum-Waidner and Waidner protocol, and in contrast with Baum-Waidner and Waidner, it does not use a non-standard notion of a signed contract.
机译:多方合同签署协议允许一组参与者彼此交换消息,以期达到一种状态,在这种状态下,每个参与者都有一个由其他所有人签署的预先约定的合同文本。 Garay和Mackenzie(GM)提出了基于私人合同签名的协议,但后来被Chadha,Kremer和Scedrov(CKS)证明是有缺陷的。 CKS的作者还通过修改其子协议之一为GM协议提供了修复。我们显示了针对任何数量(n> 4)签名者的修订版GM协议的攻击。此外,我们认为我们的攻击表明GM主协议的消息交换结构存在缺陷:无论受托方做什么,都会对某些签名者造成不公平。这意味着不可能为Garay和MacKenzie的主协议定义可信方协议。我们称之为“解决不可能”。我们提出了一种新的乐观多方合同签署协议,该协议也基于私有合同签名。我们提供一个证明,证明我们的协议满足公平性,并且在NuSMV模型检查器中针对五个签署者的情况进行了形式分析。该协议要求在乐观执行中发送n(n-1)([n / 2] + 1)条消息,这大约是最新的Baum-Waidner和Waidner所需消息的数量的一半协议,并且与Baum-Waidner和Waidner相比,它不使用已签订合同的非标准概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号