首页> 外文期刊>Digital policy, regulation and governance >How do government regulations and policies respond to the growing online-enabled transportation service (OETS) in Indonesia the Philippines and Taiwan?
【24h】

How do government regulations and policies respond to the growing online-enabled transportation service (OETS) in Indonesia the Philippines and Taiwan?

机译:政府法规和政策如何应对印度尼西亚的越来越多的在线运输服务(宠物)菲律宾和台湾?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to explore the dynamic context of the sharing economy in the transportation sector. This paper looks into the development of government regulations on the growing business of transportation network companies in Indonesia, the Philippines (represented as middle-income countries) and Taiwan (high-income country). How do government regulations and policies respond to the growing online-enabled transportation service (OETS) in Indonesia, the Philippines and Taiwan? Design/methodology/approach - This study is qualitative-comparative research. Data on the transportation sector of each country have been gathered from reputable online sources. Findings - Authors found evidence that the policy responses made by the Governments of Indonesia, Philippines and Taiwan to the sharing economy in the transportation sector are incremental and trial-error based policies. Research limitations - This paper has not addressed the policy issues' relationship between driver and platform companies. Practical implications - The future of the relationship between sharing firms and local governments suggests that the focus should be on stronger consumer protections, deeper economic redistribution and achievement of other policy aims (Rauch and Schleicher, 2015). Originality/value - This is a comparative study on different levels of economy, particularly between low-or middle-income and high-income country.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在探讨交通部门共享经济的动态背景。本文探讨了对印度尼西亚的交通网络公司越来越多的政府法规的发展,菲律宾(代表中等收入国家)和台湾(高收入国家)。政府法规和政策如何应对印度尼西亚,菲律宾和台湾的越来越多的在线运输服务(OETs)?设计/方法/方法 - 本研究是定性比较研究。关于每个国家的交通部门的数据来自众所周知的在线来源。调查结果 - 提交人证据表明,印度尼西亚,菲律宾和台湾在交通界分享经济上的政策答复是基于增量和审判的政策。研究限制 - 本文没有解决司机和平台公司之间的政策问题。实际意义 - 分享公司与地方政府之间关系的未来表明,重点应采取更强的消费者保护,更深入的经济再分配和实现其他政策目标(Rauch和Schleicher,2015)。原创性/价值 - 这是对不同经济水平的比较研究,特别是在低收入或中等收入和高收入国家之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号