首页> 外文期刊>Industrial marketing management >Asset specificity and complementarity and MNE ownership strategies: The role of institutional distances
【24h】

Asset specificity and complementarity and MNE ownership strategies: The role of institutional distances

机译:资产专用性和互补性以及跨国公司所有权策略:制度距离的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study integrates transaction cost economics and institutional theory to propose a contingency model of multinational enterprises' design of ownership control. We posit that asset specificity and complementarity influence the design of ownership control, which is further affected by the institutional environment. Furthermore, we argue that regulatory distance and normative distance display differentiating moderations on the main effects. Regulatory distance strengthens the positive effect of asset specificity on ownership control while normative distance enhances the negative effect of asset complementarity on ownership control. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:该研究将交易成本经济学与制度理论相结合,提出了跨国企业所有权控制设计的权变模型。我们认为资产的特殊性和互补性会影响所有权控制的设计,而所有权控制的设计会进一步受到制度环境的影响。此外,我们认为监管距离和规范距离在主要影响上表现出不同的适度。监管距离增强了资产专用性对所有权控制的积极影响,而规范距离增强了资产互补性对所有权控制的不利影响。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号