首页> 外文期刊>Industrial management & data systems >Future competitiveness: viewpoints from manufacturers and service providers
【24h】

Future competitiveness: viewpoints from manufacturers and service providers

机译:未来竞争力:制造商和服务提供商的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to compare and evaluate competitive priorities between manufacturers and service providers. A concern over the trends of moving manufacturing/production units overseas, while maintaining essential service operations at the companies' headquarters, encouraged senior administrators of the Federation of Thai Industries (FTI) to suggest the study. This study was part of an effort to support FTI members facing separate locations between manufacturing and services operations, and to help evaluate its initiatives' usefulness towards these members. Design/methodology/approach - The survey, developed by Takala, was modified to gather the opinions from top executives of 75 manufacturers and service providers. This survey consisted of six criteria or competitive priorities with a total of 31 dimensions. The basic statistical techniques such as Cronbach's α were applied. Findings - The paper finds that in general, top executives from manufacturing and service operations shared and agreed that delivery/service provision and quality represented their future competitive priorities. Practical implications - The selection of these two competitive priorities was generally consistent with several previous studies. These findings supported past and current initiatives by the FTI as well as its policy on working together with key public agencies/organizations towards an achievement of excellent quality. Top executives, facing a challenge on separate operations - manufacturing plant in one location while maintaining service operations at another location, could synchronize and coordinate their future efforts such as strategies and plans around delivery/service provision, and quality. Originality/value - The knowledge on competitive priorities could potentially help companies, regardless of operational types, to further formulate operational strategies, and later develop action plans. This knowledge could also serve as feedback (e.g. usefulness and effectiveness) and a milestone for the FTFs support and initiatives for its members.
机译:目的-本文旨在比较和评估制造商和服务提供商之间的竞争优先级。对于将制造/生产单位移至海外的趋势的担忧,同时又维持了公司总部的基本服务运营,这鼓励了泰国工业联合会(FTI)的高级管理人员提出了建议。这项研究是支持FTI成员面对制造和服务运营之间不同位置的努力的一部分,并有助于评估其倡议对这些成员的有用性。设计/方法/方法-由Takala开发的调查经过修改,以收集75家制造商和服务提供商的高层管理人员的意见。该调查由六个标准或竞争优先级组成,共31个维度。应用了基本的统计技术,例如Cronbach'sα。调查结果-该论文发现,总体而言,制造和服务运营的高管人员分享并同意,交付/服务的提供和质量代表着他们未来的竞争重点。实际意义-选择这两个竞争优先级通常与先前的一些研究一致。这些发现支持了FTI过去和当前的举措以及FTI与主要公共机构/组织合作以实现卓越质量的政策。高层管理人员面临着单独运营的挑战-在一个地点的制造工厂同时在另一个地点维持服务运营,他们可以同步和协调他们未来的工作,例如围绕交付/服务提供以及质量的战略和计划。原创性/价值-有关竞争优先级的知识可能会帮助公司(无论经营类型如何)进一步制定经营策略,并在以后制定行动计划。这些知识也可以作为反馈(例如,有用性和有效性),也是FTF为其成员提供支持和倡议的里程碑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号