首页> 外文期刊>Husserl Studies >The Missing Chapter from the Logical Investigations: Husserl on Lotze’s Formal and Real Significance of Logical Laws
【24h】

The Missing Chapter from the Logical Investigations: Husserl on Lotze’s Formal and Real Significance of Logical Laws

机译:逻辑研究中的遗漏篇:胡塞尔谈洛兹的逻辑法则的形式和实际意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the Logical Investigations Husserl announced a critique of Lotze’s epistemology, but it was never included in the printed text. The aim of my paper is to investigate the remnant of Husserl’s planned text with special emphasis on the question of whether it goes beyond the obvious aspects of Husserl’s indebtedness to Lotze. Using Husserl’s student notes, excerpts, and book annotations, I refine the dating of Husserl’s encounter with Lotze and separate the various layers of influence. I argue that Husserl’s acquaintance with Lotze’s epistemology forms a separate layer of influence, and that this layer cannot antedate the middle of the decade before the Logical Investigation. Husserl’s investigation of Lotze’s epistemology constitutes the most interesting aspect of the unpublished text that underlies the missing chapter from the Logical Investigations. I show that the most relevant influence of Lotze’s epistemology on Husserl lies in Lotze’s idea of the formal and real significance of logical laws. Although Husserl negatively evaluated Lotze’s epistemological problem both in the planned chapter and in other printed parts of the Logical Investigations, the problem repeatedly surfaced during Husserl’s Göttingen period. Finally, I use an unpublished student transcript to reconstruct Husserl’s SS 1912 seminar on Lotze’s epistemology. I argue that the deeper dimension of Lotze’s epistemological problem (and Husserl’s rejection of it) lies in the way that it highlights the epistemological function of phenomenology.
机译:胡塞尔在《逻辑调查》中宣布了对洛泽认识论的批评,但它从未包含在印刷文本中。我的论文的目的是调查胡塞尔计划文本的剩余部分,并特别强调它是否超出了胡塞尔欠洛泽的明显表面的问题。通过使用胡塞尔的学生笔记,摘录和书籍注解,我完善了胡塞尔与洛泽的约会的日期,并划分了各个层次的影响力。我认为,胡塞尔对洛泽认识论的了解构成了一个单独的影响层,并且这一层不能早于逻辑调查之前的十年中期。胡塞尔对洛兹认识论的调查构成了未出版文本中最有趣的方面,该文本构成了《逻辑调查》中缺失章节的基础。我证明洛泽的认识论对胡塞尔的影响最大,在于洛泽对逻辑法则的形式和实际意义的看法。尽管胡塞尔在计划的章节和《逻辑研究》的其他印刷部分中都对洛泽的认识论问题进行了否定的评估,但是在胡塞尔的哥廷根时期,问题反复出现。最后,我使用一个未发表的学生成绩单来重建胡塞尔关于洛泽认识论的1919年SS研讨会。我认为,洛泽认识论问题的更深层面(以及胡塞尔对它的拒绝)在于,它突出了现象学的认识论功能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Husserl Studies》 |2013年第3期|181-209|共29页
  • 作者

    Peter Andras Varga;

  • 作者单位

    Husserl-Archiv der Universität zu Köln">(1);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:21:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号