首页> 外文期刊>Human Studies >Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author
【24h】

Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author

机译:福柯和德里达:赋予作者权力和丧失权力的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article focuses on Michel Foucault’s concepts of authorship and power. Jacques Derrida has often been accused of being more of a literary author than a philosopher or political theorist. Richard Rorty complains that Derrida’s views on politics are not pragmatic enough; he sees Derrida’s later work, including his political work, more as a “private self-fashioning” than concrete political thinking aimed at devising short-term solutions to problems here and now. Employing Foucault’s work around authorship and the origins of power, I show that Derrida is indeed fashioning himself. This self-fashioning is not merely private or fanciful. Rather, I argue that Derrida can be read as employing what Foucault would call “technologies of the self” to not only show the play of possibility and impossibility at work in all politics and thought, but also to use his savoir to create two important and potentially constructive power structures. First, there is the power of deconstruction itself as a “militant critique” that calls for a forceful and irreducible justice. Second, there is the power of Derrida himself, understood as leaving behind a legacy of himself as the “originator” of deconstruction and as a public intellectual.
机译:本文重点介绍米歇尔·福柯的著作权和权力概念。雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)经常被指责为文学作家,而不是哲学家或政治理论家。理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)抱怨德里达对政治的看法还不够实际。他认为德里达的后来工作,包括他的政治工作,更多地是一种“私人的自我塑造”,而不是旨在为当前和现在的问题设计短期解决方案的具体政治思想。利用福柯围绕著作权和权力起源所做的工作,我证明德里达确实在塑造自己。这种自我塑造不仅是私人的或幻想的。相反,我认为德里达可以理解为采用了福柯所谓的“自我技术”,不仅展示了工作在所有政治和思想中的可能性和不可能,而且还利用他的聪明才智创造了两个重要的主题。具有潜在建设性的权力结构。首先,解构本身具有作为“武装批判”的力量,需要强有力和不可还原的正义。第二,德里达本人的力量,被理解为留下自己的遗产,成为解构的“始作俑者”和公共知识分子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号