首页> 外文期刊>Human Studies >Values, Knowledge and Solidarity: Neglected Convergences Between Émile Durkheim and Max Scheler
【24h】

Values, Knowledge and Solidarity: Neglected Convergences Between Émile Durkheim and Max Scheler

机译:价值观,知识和团结:ÉmileDurkheim和Max Scheler之间被忽视的融合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Within the purview of the sociology of knowledge Durkheim and Scheler appear among its important inaugurators theorizing the social foundations of knowledge, seemingly from mutually exclusive perspectives. Scheler’s phenomenology of values and community is often juxtaposed with Durkheim’s attempt to integrate values in reality, represented by the social configuration of organic solidarity. This essay argues that the affinity between Scheler and Durkheim deserves reexamination. Means employed for pursuing this aim include a reconsideration of how values mediate reality, but, above all, an attempt to show that both thinkers converge on their principal normative goal. This is no other than a global community of solidarity which both Scheler and Durkheim, albeit through different trails, visualize as the culmination of value-ethics. While Durkheim pursues this goal through a systematic exposition of the transition from mechanical to organic solidarity, late Scheler’s view of ‘the age of adjustment’ discloses a normative approach on modernity at odds with the then prevalent Kulturkritik. This ideal helps to rehabilitate Scheler and to approach the notions of sociality, the sociology of knowledge and the configuration of the ‘encompassing person’ through Durkheimian lenses. The essay concludes with a brief appraisal of theoretical gains drawn from this newly lit affinity.
机译:在知识社会学的范围内,涂尔干和舍勒似乎是从相互排斥的角度对知识的社会基础进行理论化的重要推动者之一。舍勒的价值观和社区现象常常与涂尔干在有机团结的社会结构中体现的将价值观整合到现实中的尝试并列。本文认为,舍勒与涂尔干之间的亲和力值得重新审视。为了实现这一目标而采取的手段包括重新考虑价值观如何调解现实,但最重要的是,试图表明两个思想家都在其主要规范目标上趋于一致。这无非是一个全球团结社区,尽管经过不同的探索,舍勒和涂尔干都将其视作价值伦理的顶点。虽然涂尔干通过系统地阐述从机械团结到有机团结的转变来追求这一目标,但舍勒后期的“调整时代”的观点揭示了一种与现代Kulturkritik不一致的现代性规范方法。这种理想有助于恢复舍勒的生活,并通过涂尔干(Durkheimian)镜头来探讨社会观念,知识社会学和“包容者”的配置。本文以对这种新近点燃的亲和力所获得的理论收益的简要评估作为结束。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Studies》 |2011年第4期|p.353-371|共19页
  • 作者

    Spiros Gangas;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology, Deree—the American College of Greece, 6 Gravias Street, Aghia Paraskevi, 153 42, Athens, Greece;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Adjustment; Convergence; Durkheim; Scheler; Solidarity; Values;

    机译:调整;收敛;Durkheim;Scheler;团结;价值观;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:22:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号