首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Development International >Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice: empirical data from the Netherlands
【24h】

Practitioner research for the professionalization of human resources practice: empirical data from the Netherlands

机译:从业人员研究的人力资源实践专业化:来自荷兰的经验数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the growing interest in and literature regarding practitioner research in human resources (HR), not much is known about the factors that play a role in the actual practice by HR practitioners. This article describes an explorative study to gain empirical insight into the use and quality of practitioner research in HR practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 Dutch HR practitioners from diverse backgrounds, posing questions about (1) their definitions of practitioner research, (2) the characteristics of the research they perform, (3) the quality and usability of the research projects in which they have taken part, and (4) the forces that drive or hinder practitioner research. We constructed theory-based coding schemes to analyse the data. To assess the quality and usability of the research performed by participants, we constructed a quality framework. Our findings show that all participants were more or less involved in HR-related practitioner research, but the quality and usability of that research could be improved. We report several causes and influencing factors. Our findings complement previous research on evidence-based HR and other practitioner research approaches and provide new insights. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for further research and practice.
机译:尽管人们对人力资源从业者研究的兴趣和文献越来越多,但对于在人力资源从业者的实际实践中起作用的因素知之甚少。本文介绍了一项探索性研究,目的是获得对人力资源实践中从业者研究的使用和质量的经验性见解。我们对来自不同背景的21名荷兰人力资源从业者进行了半结构化访谈,提出了以下问题:(1)他们对从业者研究的定义;(2)他们从事的研究的特征;(3)研究项目的质量和可用性(4)推动或阻碍从业者研究的力量。我们构建了基于理论的编码方案来分析数据。为了评估参与者进行的研究的质量和可用性,我们构建了质量框架。我们的发现表明,所有参与者或多或少都参与了与人力资源相关的从业人员研究,但是该研究的质量和可用性可以提高。我们报告了几种原因和影响因素。我们的发现补充了以前基于证据的HR和其他从业者研究方法的研究,并提供了新的见解。根据我们的发现,我们讨论了对进一步研究和实践的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号