首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Development International >A Feminist Poststructuralist Analysis Of Hrd: Why Bodies, Power And Reflexivity Matter
【24h】

A Feminist Poststructuralist Analysis Of Hrd: Why Bodies, Power And Reflexivity Matter

机译:对Hrd的女性主义后结构主义分析:为什么身体,力量和反身很重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A burgeoning amount of scholarship has attempted to unravel critical approaches to investigating human resource development (HRD). There are limited critiques, however, of gender, diversity and the intersections of these deliberations within HRD theorizing. Adopting a feminist poststructuralist approach, this paper advances critical understandings of HRD by challenging epistemological and dominant theorizing in HRD. The author examines what it means when HRD writings are said to be gendered; how the political and processual dynamics of doing HRD can be understood; how the differences for doing gender, doing HRD and embodying HRD can be unravelled; and how feminist modes of inquiry can engender the value of embodied reflexivity. Weaving together literature strands from gender and education, gender and organization, and women's studies and feminist writings, the paper provides a foundational framework for how HRD scholars can re-imagine new knowledge and inject notions of the feminine and difference in HRD writings. The analysis focuses on three interrelated areas and their implications for feminist critique: the importance of examining language and discourse in HRD; the performing body in HRD; and, finally, feminist embodied reflexivity. It is argued that the HRD scholarly community should consider critical modes of inquiry to refresh and renew HRD theory building, specifically that we should examine conceptualizations of the feminine and difference in HRD writings in order to aid transformational practice.
机译:大量的学术研究试图揭示研究人力资源开发(HRD)的关键方法。但是,在人力资源开发理论方面,对性别,多样性以及这些讨论的交叉点的批评很少。本文采用女权主义的后结构主义方法,通过挑战HRD的认识论和主导理论,对HRD提出了批判性的理解。作者研究了当HRD著作被认为是性别时的含义。如何理解进行人力资源开发的政治和过程动力;如何阐明性别,HRD和体现HRD的差异;以及女权主义的探究模式如何赋予体现的反身价值。该论文将性别与教育,性别与组织,女性研究和女权主义著作的文学作品融合在一起,为HRD学者如何重新构想新知识并注入关于HRD著作中女性和差异的观念提供了基础框架。分析着重于三个相互关联的领域及其对女权主义批评的影响:在人力资源开发中考察语言和话语的重要性;人力资源开发司的表演机构;最后,女权主义者体现了反思性。有人认为,人力资源开发学者界应考虑采用重要的探究方式来刷新和更新人力资源开发理论体系,特别是,我们应该研究女性化的概念化以及人力资源开发著作中的差异,以帮助进行转化实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号