首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors >Low-Back Pain Ratings for Lifetime, 1 -Month Period, and Point Prevalences in a Large Occupational Population
【24h】

Low-Back Pain Ratings for Lifetime, 1 -Month Period, and Point Prevalences in a Large Occupational Population

机译:大量职业人群的终生,1个月期间和点患病率的腰背疼痛评分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: This manuscript systematically quantifies multiple measures of low-back pain (LBP) prevalence by pain rating in a large, multisite cohort of workers. Background: Published LBP prevalence rates vary. Studies rely on one measure of LBP and none report prevalence stratified by pain rating. Method: Cross-sectional analyses of baseline data from a multicenter prospective cohort study were performed to evaluate differences in lifetime prevalence, I -month period prevalence, and point prevalence of LBR Workers were from 28 different employment settings in 4 diverse U.S. states.All workers completed computerized questionnaires and structured interviews. LBP prevalence measures were stratified by pain ratings. Results: A total of 828 subjects had complete health data at baseline. Lifetime prevalence, I-month period prevalence, and point prevalence for any LBP (≥1/10) were 63.4%, 44.0%, and 20.8% respectively. Prevalence of LBP decreased with increasing pain ratings. As an example, using a threshold of LBP ≥ 3/10 pain, prevalence measures were 61.0%, 37.6%, and 16.7% respectively. A threshold of LBP ≥ 5/10 had prevalence measures of 51.2%, 22.9%, and 9.9% respectively. Age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and tobacco use were statistically significantly related to lifetime prevalence of LBR Conclusion: Lifetime LBP prevalence, I-month period prevalence, and point prevalence stratified by pain ratings demonstrate a wide variation of prevalence measures of LBP and self-reported pain ratings. Higher pain rating thresholds yield lower prevalence measures and may impact assessments of risk factors. Differences in pain ratings may allow for focused surveillance within an occupational cohort.
机译:目的:该手稿通过对大型,多地点工人群体的疼痛评估系统地量化了多种下腰痛(LBP)患病率的措施。背景:公布的LBP患病率各不相同。研究仅依靠一项LBP指标,没有一项报告通过疼痛等级对患病率进行分层。方法:对来自多中心前瞻性队列研究的基准数据进行横断面分析,以评估LBR工人的终身患病率,I个月患病率和点患病率的差异来自美国4个不同州的28个不同的就业环境。完成计算机问卷和结构化访谈。 LBP患病率按疼痛等级进行分层。结果:总共828名受试者在基线时具有完整的健康数据。任何LBP(≥1/ 10)的终生患病率,I个月患病率和点患病率分别为63.4%,44.0%和20.8%。 LBP的患病率随着疼痛等级的增加而降低。例如,使用LBP≥3/10的疼痛阈值,患病率分别为61.0%,37.6%和16.7%。 LBP≥5/10的阈值的患病率分别为51.2%,22.9%和9.9%。年龄,收缩压和舒张压,高胆固醇,高血压和吸烟与LBR的终身患病率在统计学上显着相关结论:终生LBP患病率,I个月患病率和按疼痛等级分层的点患病率表明差异很大LBP的患病率指标和自我报告的疼痛等级。较高的疼痛等级阈值会导致较低的患病率,并且可能会影响风险因素的评估。疼痛等级的差异可能允许在职业队列中进行重点监视。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Factors》 |2014年第1期|86-97|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational & Environment Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, 391 Chipeta Way, Suite C, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA;

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;

    University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wl, USA;

    Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, TX, USA;

    University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wl, USA;

    University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wl, USA;

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    epidemiology; risk factors; cohort; ergonomics; cross-sectional study design;

    机译:流行病学风险因素;队列人体工程学横断面研究设计;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:18:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号