首页> 外文期刊>Human Development >Explanatory Co-Existence
【24h】

Explanatory Co-Existence

机译:解释性共存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditionally, science and religion have often been viewed in competition, with the belief that rational, scientific thought wins out in the end. The authors of this volume provide compelling arguments that suggest that this replacement model does not hold up. Rather, recent psychological research suggests that forms of reasoning, even forms believed to be in conflict, such as supernatural and scientific thought, often coexist in the minds of both children and adults. The focus of this issue is on exploring how and when individuals endorse beliefs that might be construed as stemming from a number of highly different and potentially conflicting worldviews and it provides important new ways of characterizing cognitive development.
机译:传统上,人们常常在竞争中看待科学和宗教,并相信理性的科学思想最终会胜出。本卷的作者提供了令人信服的论点,表明该替代模型无法成立。相反,最近的心理学研究表明,推理的形式,甚至被认为是冲突的形式,例如超自然的和科学的思想,通常在儿童和成人的思想中共存。本期的重点是探讨个人如何以及何时认可可能被解释为源自许多高度不同且可能相互冲突的世界观的信念,并且它提供了表征认知发展的重要新方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号