首页> 外文期刊>Human Development >Taking Emergence Seriously: The Centrality of Circular Causality for Dynamic Systems Approaches to Development
【24h】

Taking Emergence Seriously: The Centrality of Circular Causality for Dynamic Systems Approaches to Development

机译:认真对待出现:循环因果关系在动态系统发展方法中的中心地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The dynamic systems (DS) approach has emerged as an influential and potentially unifying metatheory for developmental science. Its central platform - the argument against design - suggests that structure spontaneously and without prescription emerges through self-organization. In one of the most prominent accounts of DS, The-len and her colleagues [Spencer, Dineva, & Schoner, 2009a; Thelen & Smith, 1994,2006] have extended the argument against design to a complete ontological rejection of structural explanation. I argue that this antistructuralist stance conceptually undermines the very principle of emergence through self-organization upon which the approach is built, jeopardizing its process focus. Taking emergence seriously entails a strong commitment to circular causality and the reciprocal nature of structure-function relations through the adoption of a pluralistic model of causality, one that recognizes both local-to-global processes of construction and global-to-local processes of constraint. Copyright©2011 S.KargerAG, Basel
机译:动态系统(DS)方法已经成为发展科学的一种有影响力并且可能统一的元理论。它的中心平台-反对设计的论点-表明结构是自发形成的,没有处方。 The-len和她的同事们在DS的一项最杰出的叙述中[Spencer,Dineva,&Schoner,2009a; Thelen&Smith,1994,2006]将反对设计的论点扩展到对结构解释的完全本体论拒绝。我认为,这种反结构主义的立场从概念上破坏了通过建立这种方法的自组织而出现的原则,从而损害了其过程重点。认真对待紧急情况意味着必须通过采用多种因果关系模型来坚定地致力于循环因果关系和结构功能关系的对等性质,该模型既可以识别本地到全球的构造过程,也可以识别全球到本地的约束过程。 。版权所有©2011 S.KargerAG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号