首页> 外文期刊>Globalizations >Rumour and decertification in exile politics: evidence from the Egyptian case
【24h】

Rumour and decertification in exile politics: evidence from the Egyptian case

机译:流亡政治中的谣言和取消资格证明:来自埃及案件的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does exile affect activism and if so how? In this paper, the case of Egyptian activists exiled in England is taken as illustrative of processes typical of exiled activism. The case study draws on primary and secondary sources including a series of biographical interviews with exiled activists. The analysis compares activism in Egypt with exiled activism in England using the participants' critical self-reflections to explain the mechanisms mediating the changes. Contrary to reasonable expectations that exile is a spontaneous response to a change in political context, the conditions for exile predate banishment and lie within the institutions of dictatorship which decertify activism. Decertification continues throughout the exile process as fear of repression becomes internalized within the movement. Within the sanctuary of the host country, a process of brokerage counteracts decertification expanding and modifying the exile repertoire.
机译:流放会影响行动主义吗?在本文中,埃及流亡在英国的激进主义者的案例被用来说明流亡的激进主义的典型过程。该案例研究借鉴了主要和次要资源,包括对流亡维权人士的一系列传记采访。该分析使用参与者的批判性自我反省来解释调解变化的机制,从而将埃及的行动主义与英格兰的放逐行动主义进行了比较。与对流亡是对政治环境变化的自发反应的合理预期相反,流放的条件早于放逐,处于独裁制度之内,该制度取消了行动主义的资格。由于担心镇压会在运动中内化,因此取消资格在整个流亡过程中仍在继续。在东道国的庇护所内,经纪人制抵消了取消资格的过程,扩大并修改了流放者的库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号